发帖
雷达卡
” STUDENT’S” letter in NATURE of December 5 shows that he has overlooked the purpose of the paper he criticizes, although it was set out in the first sentence of the summary as follows:
” This enquiry was carried out to test the truth of the opinion expressed by Student that randomization（随机性） achieves its object usually at the expense of increasing the variability when compared with balanced arrangements, and that one of the means available to experimenters of reducing the error is by adopting a regular balanced arrangement.”
若能收集到该词条相关资料的跟帖者给予奖励，根据收集资料的水平给予10～200不等的论坛币，当然也可以谈谈自己的观点、其应用领域、上传资料、相关软件介绍等等，请大家尽量不要复制一些搜索引擎很容易收集到的资料。
我每天都会发送不等数量的词条，所以诚邀不同统计背景的各路大侠发表评论。
欢迎大家多多跟帖！要数量也要质量哟
京公网安备 11010802022788号
