楼主: wenO6ZTcp8ct6
358 0

[英文文献] An iterated GMM procedure for estimating the Campbell-Cochrane habit format... [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

已卖:29份资源

初中生

95%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
510 个
通用积分
93.0717
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
330 点
帖子
11
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-16
最后登录
2020-9-16

楼主
wenO6ZTcp8ct6 发表于 2004-9-4 18:40:58 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:An iterated GMM procedure for estimating the Campbell-Cochrane habit formation model, with an application to Danish stock and bond returns
英文文献作者:Tom Engsted,Stig V. M?ller
英文文献摘要:
We suggest an iterated GMM approach to estimate and test the consumption based habit persistence model of Campbell and Cochrane (1999), and we apply the approach on annual and quarterly Danish stock and bond returns. For comparative purposes we also estimate and test the standard CRRA model. In addition, we compare the pricing errors of the different models using Hansen and Jagannathan’s (1997) specification error measure. The main result is that for Denmark the Campbell-Cochrane model does not seem to perform markedly better than the CRRA model. For the long annual sample period covering more than 80 years there is absolutely no evidence of superior performance of the Campbell-Cochrane model. For the shorter and more recent quarterly data over a 20-30 year period, there is some evidence of counter-cyclical time-variation in the degree of risk-aversion, in accordance with the Campbell-Cochrane model, but the model does not produce lower pricing errors or more plausible parameter estimates than the CRRA model.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-29 03:03