楼主: fgleric
1808 1

[Review of Econ and Stat (Nov 2012)]SCHOOLING, POLITICAL PARTICIPATION, AND THE [推广有奖]

  • 5关注
  • 51粉丝

贵宾

副教授

37%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
1
论坛币
360000 个
通用积分
479.1720
学术水平
294 点
热心指数
310 点
信用等级
226 点
经验
18021 点
帖子
528
精华
0
在线时间
546 小时
注册时间
2007-3-16
最后登录
2020-10-4

楼主
fgleric 发表于 2013-1-4 10:20:51 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
SCHOOLING, POLITICAL PARTICIPATION, AND THE ECONOMY.pdf (213.04 KB)
本次提一下2012年 ReEconSta的一篇文章,先看一下摘要部分:
Abstract—We investigate how the link between individual schooling and political participation is affected by country characteristics. Using individual survey data, we find that political participation is more responsive to schooling in land-abundant countries and less responsive in human capital–abundant countries, even while controlling for country political institutions and cultural attitudes. We find related evidence that political participation is less responsive to schooling in countries with a higher skill premium, as well as within countries for individuals in skilled occupations. The evidence motivates a theoretical explanation in which patterns of political participation are influenced by the opportunity cost of engaging in political rather than production activities.


我简单总结一下:
国家特征如何影响入学教育与政治参与的关系。基本发现有如下特征
1, 地域辽阔的国家,政治参与易受入学教育的影响;
2,人力资本丰富的国家,该影响较小;
以上两点,在考虑了国家政治制度和文化态度,依然成立。
3,在高技能premium较高的国家,该效应较小;
4,在高技能职业较高的国家,该效应较小。
5,初步构思理论框架如下:政治参与的模式,要受到参与政治活动的机会成本,而不是生产活动的机会成本的影响。

针对以上结论,大家伙可针对一点或两点展开说说。
(本文似乎带点政治性的讨论,因此建议大家不要脱离本文的话题而泛泛而言。)

参考资料(取自本文)
A,回归方程:
政治参与程度=beta1*个体特征向量+beta2*个体教育程度+beta3*个体特征向量×国家特征+beta4*国家固定效应+cluster effect+error term
B,数据来源:World Values Survey (WVS), a rich study of sociocultural attitudes around the world. Four waves of the
WVS are available (conducted in 1981–1984, 1989–1993, 1994–1999, and 1999–2004)
C,政治参与程度变量构造所使用的WVS数据:
1. Interest in politics (question E023): “How interested would you say you are in politics?” 0 = Not at all interested, 1 = Not very interested, 2 = Somewhat interested, 3 = Very interested.
2. Importance of politics (question A004): “For each of the following aspects, indicate how important it is in your life. Politics.” 0 = Not at all important, 1 = Not very important, 2 = Rather important, 3 = Very important.

3. Discuss politics (question A062): “When you get together with your friends, would you say you discuss political matters  requently, occasionally, or never?” 0 = Never, 1 = Occasionally, 2 = Frequently.
4. Petition (question E025): “Now I’d like you to look at this card. I’m going to read out some different forms of political action that people can take, and I’d like you to tell me, for each one, whether you have actually done any of these things, whether you might do it or would never, under any circumstances, do it. Signing a petition.” 0 = Would never do, 1 = Might do, 2 = Have
done.
5. Demonstrate (question E027): Same question as for Petition, now referring to “Attending lawful demonstrations.” 0 =Would never do, 1 = Might do, 2 = Have done.



二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Political Schooling politic school Review individual countries political cultural evidence

已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
sunkai_bick + 60 + 36 + 5 + 5 精彩帖子

总评分: 经验 + 60  论坛币 + 36  学术水平 + 5  热心指数 + 5   查看全部评分

本帖被以下文库推荐

沙发
sewind_tj 发表于 2013-1-5 17:18:30
真的不错,谢谢!
善待你一生!
让网络基于真人的故事!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-2 01:00