楼主: pertain
289 1

[文献] Science Direct JFE [推广有奖]

已卖:3857份资源

院士

8%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
248003 个
通用积分
3495.9662
学术水平
29 点
热心指数
30 点
信用等级
19 点
经验
46596 点
帖子
1094
精华
0
在线时间
4171 小时
注册时间
2004-11-13
最后登录
2025-9-30

楼主
pertain 在职认证  发表于 2013-1-29 13:09:47 |AI写论文
10论坛币
Lundblad, C. (2007). "The risk return tradeoff in the long run: 1836–2003." Journal of Financial Economics 85(1): 123-150.
    Previous studies typically find a statistically insignificant relation between the market risk premium and its expected volatility. Further, several of these studies estimate a negative risk return tradeoff, contrary to the predictions of mainstream theory. Using simulations, I demonstrate that even 100 years of data constitute a small sample that may easily lead to this finding even though the true risk return tradeoff is positive. Small-sample inference is plagued by the fact that conditional volatility has almost no explanatory power for realized returns. Using the nearly two century history of U.S. equity market returns from Schwert [1990. Indexes of United States stock prices from 1802 to 1987. Journal of Business 63, 399–426], I estimate a positive and statistically significant risk return tradeoff. Finally, exploratory analysis suggests a role for a time-varying relation linked to the changing nature of the U.S. economy.


【全文链接或数据库名称(选填)】

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X07000360

关键词:Science Direct SCIE dir ect 数据库

回帖推荐

suhongyu000 发表于2楼  查看完整内容

this one?

沙发
suhongyu000 发表于 2013-1-29 13:14:11
this one?
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?我要注册
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
平凡的平凡 + 50 根据规定进行奖励

总评分: 论坛币 + 50   查看全部评分

专心读书,好好做人。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-24 13:00