JFE比JOF还好？

匿名者 发表于 2013-6-12 11:42
JF=JFE>>>>RFS>JFQA

别开玩笑了

时间的背影 发表于 2013-8-4 06:38
别开玩笑了

You made my day by this joke.

Ask any one, your professors, your instructor(s) or advicer(s), your dean(s), any one who qualifies as an economist, dude, and be adviced by the common sense, which you really need to learn.

JF比JFE略好，JF和JFE是跟任何领域top相比都不逊色的好期刊。这两个显然要比RFS强一截，RFS，虽然号称金融三大之一，其实也就是凑数而已。

好坏很容易分，你问问发RFS的人给机会换发到JF或JFE上，我相信没有人会拒绝。但你问问能发在JF和JFE的文章，换发RFS，看看有谁会愿意？

再强调一遍，对杂志的理解和排序是长期的功夫，千万不要用IF去随便评价期刊，那个东西对业内人士毫无价值。

Again, JF=JFE>>>>RFS>JFQA.


For the rookies, please stop asking silly questions, and just keep that simple fact in mind.

mazarin 发表于 2013-8-4 20:22
JF比JFE略好，JF和JFE是跟任何领域top相比都不逊色的好期刊。这两个显然要比RFS强一截，RFS，虽然号称金融三 ...

Second this.

No one would trade a JF/JFE with a RFS, unless he or she was hopelessly stupid or totally insane. JF is as good as JFE. Some might slightly prefer the former; others might prefer the latter. And both of them are top journals in both Econ&Finance fields.
Some finance guys might even believe JF/JFE is as good as TOP4. I would say that they are not crazy or exaggerating within the field of finance (or financial economics).