楼主: 证交所232
602 0

[英文文献] The Static and Dynamic Benefits of Migration and Remittances in Nicaragua-尼... [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-19
最后登录
2020-9-19

楼主
证交所232 发表于 2005-6-5 04:01:27 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:The Static and Dynamic Benefits of Migration and Remittances in Nicaragua-尼加拉瓜移徙和汇款的静态和动态利益
英文文献作者:Lykke E. Andersen,Bent Jesper Christensen
英文文献摘要:
This paper utilizes a unique three-wave panel of household data from Nicaragua, which allows a thorough exploration of the relationships between migration, remittances and household consumption. The paper distinguishes between the effects of emigration and the impacts of remittances received. There is a self-selection bias in the decision to send a migrant, as well as in the decision to receive remittances. To adequately correct for these selection biases, we develop a bivariate selection correction procedure. Perhaps surprisingly, the results show that households do not benefit (in terms of higher consumption growth) from receiving remittances, but rather from having migrants abroad. This suggests that not only money are remitted from abroad, but also something more subtle, which could be business ideas, belief systems, aspirations, patterns of social interaction, and other intangibles, which have been dubbed social remittances.

本文利用了来自尼加拉瓜的独特的家庭数据三波面板,从而可以深入探讨移民、汇款和家庭消费之间的关系。本文对移民的影响和收到汇款的影响进行了区分。在决定是否派遣移徙者以及在决定是否接收汇款时,存在着自我选择的偏见。为了充分纠正这些选择偏差,我们开发了一个二元选择校正程序。或许令人惊讶的是,调查结果显示,接受汇款并不能让家庭受益(就更高的消费增长而言),而是让移民移居国外。这表明,从国外汇来的不仅是钱,还有一些更微妙的东西,比如商业理念、信仰体系、抱负、社会互动模式以及其他无形的东西,这些东西被称为社会汇款。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-29 11:15