楼主: midi51
3675 2

Edward Glaeser__Psychology and the Market [推广有奖]

已卖:5551份资源

学术权威

5%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
9
论坛币
204632 个
通用积分
50.7114
学术水平
352 点
热心指数
334 点
信用等级
297 点
经验
57592 点
帖子
3124
精华
9
在线时间
1282 小时
注册时间
2004-9-11
最后登录
2023-1-25

楼主
midi51 发表于 2004-10-27 00:55:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

1923.rar (242.22 KB) 本附件包括:

  • Glaeser-psychology and the market.pdf

Psychology and the Market

---- Abstract -----

Prospect theory, loss aversion, mental accounts, hyperbolic discounting, cues, and the endowment effect can all be seen as examples of situationalism -- the view that people isolate decisions and overweight immediate aspects of the situation relative to longer term concerns. But outside of the laboratory, emotionally-powerful situational factors -- frames, social influence, mental accounts -- are almost always endogenous and often the result of self-interested entrepreneurs. As such, laboratory work and, indeed, psychology more generally, gives us little guidance as to market outcomes. Economics provides a stronger basis for understanding the supply of emotionally-relevant situational variables. Paradoxically situationalism actually increases the relative importance of economics.

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Psychology Glaeser psycho Edward market market Psychology Edward Glaeser

沙发
midi51 发表于 2004-10-27 00:59:00

For a critique of behavioral economics, see Edward Glaeser, "Psychology and the Market," AER, May, 2004, 408-13. This is an attack on Kahneman whose Nobel lecture summarizes his findings--"Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics," AER, Dec, 2003, 1449-75. I never thought Kahneman believed that a critique of the rational choice model was an argument for government and paternalism, but Glaeser seems to think so. Mullainathan and Thaler's paper "Behavioral Economics" anticipates Glaeser's critique. Perhaps the emphasis in Kahneman's experimental research on mistaken estimates of objectivly knowable numbers misses the point that different frames produce different choices where there is no prior truth. There is no such thing as my true preferences that different frames may distort. All my preferences have some frame and evolve as I learn. What do you think?

______ Allan Schmid

藤椅
ebdl 发表于 2006-3-12 00:38:00
thanks
薪火相傳All books are in PDF format unless told to the contrary.All books are sold out at 2 dollars.Responses to my topics will encourage more.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-6 07:26