楼主: 三德子
2735 1

help [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

大专生

43%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
108 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
937 点
帖子
39
精华
0
在线时间
30 小时
注册时间
2007-3-11
最后登录
2016-6-2

楼主
三德子 发表于 2007-12-31 19:55:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

However, I do not think that you get it right because I do not think
that you have started from the vantage point of seeing things through the point of view of the authors.
Especially you have not started from the vantage point
that utility maximization, whatever that utility may be describes human
behavior. That is not my view but the view of
every professional economist. But then it becomes necessary to actually
categorize what the utility function is.
 
your comments  fail to understand what
economists do with utility functions (as for example
Gary Becker) then I think that you cannot begin to understand the
purpose of the book

what does this mean ?

how can we evaluate utility theory? please help.

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Help elp maximization Professional Understand Help

沙发
Pararox 发表于 2008-1-4 07:29:00

红字部分主要在说: 笔者不赞同多数出他自己之外的专业经济学家所支持的效用理论以及效用最大化理论能够很好的解释人类行为。他认为应该更好的对效用的功能进行分类,而不是眉毛胡子一把抓的像Gary Becker等人那样。 他还表达了对"you"的不满,认为没有领会对自己的意思。

请点击下面的图片进入我的小店:

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-26 21:55