楼主: marake
1252 2

[FRM考试] 请教 第六版handbook例题16.5 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

高中生

85%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
996 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
333 点
帖子
41
精华
0
在线时间
35 小时
注册时间
2010-1-20
最后登录
2017-5-16

楼主
marake 发表于 2014-5-2 22:51:28 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
第六版handbook例题16.5

In early 2000,a risk manager caculates the VAR for a technology stock fund based on the past three years of data. The strategy of the fund is to buy stocks and write out-of-the-money puts. The manager needs to compute VAR. Which of the following methods would yeild results that are least representative of the risks inherent in tne portfolio?
a. Historical simulation with full repricing
b.Delta-normal VAR assuming zero drift
c. Monte Carlo style VAR assuming aero drift with full repricing
d. Historical simulation using delta equivalents for all positions

ans:d.   Because the portfolio has options, methods a. or c. based on full repricing would be appropriate.Next,recall that technoloy stocks had a big increase in price until Mar. 2000. From 1996-1999,the NASDAQ index went from 1300to 4000.This creats a positive drift in the series of returns, So,historical simulation without an adjustment for this drift would bias the simulated returns upward,thereby underestimating VAR.


看不懂答案,b、d 选项为什么对错,以及positive drift 为什么会导致低估VAR,恳请大虾帮忙解释一下,非常感谢!!!!!

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:第六版handbook handbook Book Hand Equivalents technology following manager methods stocks

沙发
wugu981018 在职认证  发表于 2014-5-2 23:14:40
飘过~~~表示还在看书中
每天进步一点点。坚持!

藤椅
marake 发表于 2014-5-3 17:42:15
wugu981018 发表于 2014-5-2 23:14
飘过~~~表示还在看书中
谢谢顶贴~
有没有大侠帮忙解读一下啊,万分感谢!!!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jr
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-21 21:55