发帖
雷达卡
英文文献：History Is As History Does: Social Responsibility And The Historical Profession-历史就是历史:社会责任和历史职业
英文文献作者：Eugen Stancu
英文文献摘要：
The relationship between states and corporations is a complex one. It has evolved over the last two century and in a recent work, the American political scientist Ian Bremmer argues that the two entities are in a state of war and this tension could even be the end of the free market. However, despite this rivalry between economics and politics, both the companies and the state claim to be responsible towards the society. For companies, ‘social responsibility’ or the ‘corporate conscience’ are the concepts generally used while in the case of state, its responsibility towards the society could not be synthesized in a term; it is multi-fold, ranging from paternalist actions and measures to discursive strategies meant to create among citizens a common sense of national unity and cohesion. In this paper I shall analyze these discursive strategies and more precisely those in which the historian has an important role, concentrating on the professional and ethical implications. The elaboration and dissemination of this message could be considered a form of social responsibility of the state. From the reconstruction of the past “as it really was” the historian has nowadays in the digital era to find the optimal relationship between memory and forgetting.
国家和企业之间的关系是复杂的。它在过去两个世纪中不断演变，在最近的一部著作中，美国政治学家伊恩?布雷默(Ian Bremmer)认为，这两个实体正处于一种战争状态，这种紧张关系甚至可能导致自由市场的终结。然而，尽管存在着经济和政治的竞争，但企业和国家都声称要对社会负责。对于企业而言，“社会责任”或“企业良心”是通常使用的概念，而对于国家而言，其对社会的责任不能用一个词来综合;它是多重的，从家长式的行动和措施到旨在在公民中建立民族团结和凝聚力的常识的漫谈策略。在本文中，我将分析这些论述策略，并更精确地分析那些历史学家扮演重要角色的策略，集中在专业和伦理含义上。拟订和传播这一信息可被视为国家的一种社会责任。从“真实”的过去的重建，历史学家如今在数字时代找到了记忆和遗忘之间的最佳关系。
京公网安备 11010802022788号
