发帖
雷达卡
英文文献：Inclusive development in environmental sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa: insights from governance mechanisms-撒哈拉以南非洲环境可持续性的包容性发展:来自治理机制的见解
英文文献作者：Simplice A. Asongu,Nicholas M. Odhiambo
英文文献摘要：
This research examines the relevance of inclusive development in modulating the role of governance on environmental degradation. The study focuses on forty-four countries in sub-Saharan Africa for the period 2000-2012. The Generalised Method of Moments is employed as the empirical strategy and CO2 emissions per capita is used to measure environmental pollution. Bundled and unbundled governance dynamics are employed, notably: political governance (consisting of political stability/no violence and “voice and accountability”), economic governance (encompassing government effectiveness and regulation quality), institutional governance (entailing corruption-control and the rule of law), and general governance (a composite measure of political governance, economic governance and institutional governance). The following main findings are established. First, the underlying net effect in the moderating role of inclusive development in the governance-CO2 emissions nexus is not significant in regressions pertaining to political governance and economic governance. Second, there are positive net effects from the relevance of inclusive development in modulating the effects of regulation quality, economic governance and general governance on CO2 emissions. The significant and insignificant effects are elucidated. Policy implications are discussed.
这项研究审查了包容性发展在调节治理对环境退化的作用方面的相关性。这项研究的重点是2000-2012年撒哈拉以南非洲的44个国家。采用矩量的概化方法作为经验策略，采用人均二氧化碳排放量来衡量环境污染。捆绑和分类治理就业动态,特别是:政治治理(包括政治稳定/不暴力和“话语权和问责制”),经济治理(包括政府和监管有效性质量),机构治理(必然要遏制腐败和法治),和一般的治理(复合测量的政治治理、经济治理和制度治理)。以下主要发现被证实。首先，包容性发展在治理-二氧化碳排放关系中的调节作用的潜在净效应在与政治治理和经济治理相关的回归中并不显著。第二，包容性发展在调节监管质量、经济治理和总体治理对二氧化碳排放的影响方面具有积极的净效应。并对显著和不显著的影响进行了说明。讨论了政策含义。
京公网安备 11010802022788号
