楼主: internet.hzx
11866 22

[我的学术之路] 如果答辩成绩不太理想是因为老师们不懂自己的论文该怎么办? [推广有奖]

11
mklsl 发表于 2015-6-16 12:50:34
一点要争取,要有学术精神,为了自己也是为了学术。

12
internet.hzx 发表于 2015-6-16 14:50:32
蜉蝣天地 发表于 2015-6-16 11:18
那篇博士论文80万字。很火的。你随便搜一下就知道了。
叫啥名字啊?

13
internet.hzx 发表于 2015-6-16 14:54:48
cqwoodman 发表于 2015-6-16 12:01
盲审专家和答辩老师都不弄?LZ玩的是哪一出?
都不懂啊。我做的是统计理论创新,国外专家意见原话是:“he presented his core thesis ideas and introduced further ideas of his thesis to us. XXXX's ideas are fundamental in the field of Statistics and Copula theory. In particular, he developed a novel concept of local dependence that permits calculation of comovement within quadrants, thereby avoiding the problems of the standard, global copula measures. He not only developed and implemented this idea for the standard copula and Kendall’s tau measures, he also extended it to several other dependence settings. XXXX's very valuable for statistics and probability theory, as well as for applications in banking and finance.”  “I was highly impressed by this concept and other research ideas of xxxxxx, and was pleased to guide his research over the past year, along with Professor XXXXXx. I have been doing research on copula theory for more than ten years and have published several papers in the area, and believe that XXXX’s work and insight are of excellent caliber. Recently, he has finished refining these ideas into a high quality paper, which represents a fundamental innovation in the copula field. We plan to submit it to a top journal in the field of Statistics.” 哥大专家评价是:"he is one of the most self-reliant PhD students I have worked with in my 25 years at columbia university"

14
internet.hzx 发表于 2015-6-16 14:56:34
mklsl 发表于 2015-6-16 12:50
一点要争取,要有学术精神,为了自己也是为了学术。
多谢你的支持!我必须得尊重自己几年的付出和智力产出啊!谢谢!明天再去找领导谈!

15
蜉蝣天地 发表于 2015-6-16 16:38:47
internet.hzx 发表于 2015-6-16 14:50
叫啥名字啊?
兄弟,你搜陈军昌就知道了。

16
internet.hzx 发表于 2015-6-16 16:49:45
蜉蝣天地 发表于 2015-6-16 16:38
兄弟,你搜陈军昌就知道了。
多谢!

17
internet.hzx 发表于 2015-6-16 20:23:39 来自手机
此留言已经设置少数人可见。

18
internet.hzx 发表于 2015-6-18 08:54:49
怎么回事???

19
sdyhfao 发表于 2015-6-18 09:06:21
个人看法:如果是觉得专家误判导致论文评审未通过,可以去申诉;如果仅仅是得分低去申诉,单位受理的可能性不大。既然论文核心内容已经投期刊,相信他的传播范围更广、速度更快,如确有开创性的东西,自会有人关注、引用。至于是否得到优秀博士论文,不必执着。

20
qilingzhenyi 发表于 2015-6-19 10:50:10 来自手机
楼主看起来真的是相当不成熟。祝你顺利吧。。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注ddjd
拉您入交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-26 04:55