[学术治理与讨论] 震惊：学术明星韩春雨涉嫌实验造假 [推广有奖]

31楼

重读柏格森 发表于 2016-7-16 10:34:28

不知道最后的结果会是如何总之做学问没那么容易的特别是要出好成果

32楼

qsf9137 发表于 2016-7-16 11:00:36

只能等待同行评价。

33楼

颸若辰

发表于 2016-7-16 11:56:17

看最后的结果吧，公道自在人心

34楼

liaoxiaosai 发表于 2016-7-16 12:53:41

http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-684007-990944.html

35楼

xueshuren 发表于 2016-7-16 13:02:59

今天凌晨知乎上已经有消息了啊，澳洲的已经重复了啊
水木版青年教师上也有了，还有个美国的好像也搞定了

有兴趣的可以去看看

36楼

lzguo568

发表于 2016-7-16 13:49:12

别忙下结论。。。。。

37楼

xueshuren 发表于 2016-7-16 13:56:35

关于澳洲那个实验
方舟子 ?@fangshimin
即使真有人能重复出来只能说韩春雨赌对了，也无法解释其电泳图的蹊跷
====然后又有人回复舟子，说方舟子的电泳技术不行。。
It's totally normal that such DNA bands are present on a same Urea-Page. The band shape could be "smile"- or "cry"-like on the same lane. The reason
lies in the
ionic strength of the loaded sample. The closer the band is to the loading
well, the bigger skewing effect the sample ionic strength makes on the band shape.

20 years ago, most labs did sequencing in house using Urea-PAGE. Most
seasoned biochemist witnessed such mixed shapes on the same PAGE.

The younger generation scientists may not be familiar with Urea-PAGE.
Ironically, a veteran biochemist also fell down to the trap today. I feel so sorry for his post on twitter.

To see more DNA Urea-PAGE results, one can refer to http://2015.igem.org/Team:Lethbridge/Results
or simple google DNA urea-page pictures.

=============
现在这个已经变成年度娱乐大戏，坐等最后结论。(目前这场片子从开始引发矛盾，到现在已经来到高潮，到底谁是反派依然扑所迷离，很快就要揭开真相）