楼主: zhaohailei
1351 0

[世界经济热点] 哈佛大学肯尼迪学院教授Frankel的论文之八 On the Euro [推广有奖]

  • 3关注
  • 57粉丝

VIP+

已卖:373份资源

学科带头人

3%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
32058 个
通用积分
147.0084
学术水平
215 点
热心指数
290 点
信用等级
183 点
经验
21786 点
帖子
884
精华
1
在线时间
886 小时
注册时间
2007-6-15
最后登录
2025-11-29

楼主
zhaohailei 发表于 2009-6-18 15:00:05 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
欧元对成员国和非成员国的影响,On the Euro: Impacts on Members and Non-Members,by Jeffrey Frankel Member, U.S. Council of Economic Advisers,发表于12/17/1998,It may be late in the game to debate the merits of EMU for its members. But I begin with a review of the pros and cons. The UK, Sweden and others have yet to decide whether to join, so for them the evaluation is still relevant. The second half of these notes will turn to the implications of the euro as a new international currency. Impacts on ountries outside EMU are discussed in addition to countries inside. Impact of EMU Per Se on the Members The two big  dvantages of fixing the exchange rate, for any country, are: (1) to reduce transactions costs and exchange rate risk, which can discourage trade and investment, and (2) to provide a credible nominal anchor for monetary policy. The big advantage of a floating exchange rate, on the other hand, is the ability to pursue an independent monetary policy.1 Which factors are likely to dominate, the advantages of fixed exchange rates or the advantages of floating? The answer must depend, in large part, on characteristics of the country in question. There is no one right answer for all countries or all times. Many of the country characteristics that are most important in this context are closely related to the size and openness of the country. This observation brings us to the theory of the Optimum Currency Area.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:frankel Franke Frank 哈佛大学 Rank Jeffrey frankel

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-25 01:22