楼主: billsmith
1420 0

[财经时事] [讨论]请大家讨论一下关于中国企业改革的问题。 [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 0粉丝

已卖:22份资源

本科生

3%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
1642432 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
536 点
帖子
71
精华
0
在线时间
28 小时
注册时间
2005-3-18
最后登录
2024-4-6

楼主
billsmith 发表于 2005-10-9 10:52:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

10. The New York Times reported in a news piece that most TVEs were sold to insiders. The reporter claimed that this is prima facie evidence that the process is corrupt. Do you agree? Explain. (Note:TVE -Town or Village Enterprise)

The Answer provided by the professor is as follows:

Selling to insiders was a natural process, since managers already had most rights to the firm in the mid-1990s, before privatization. They had superior knowledge of firm. The main problem to overcome was at what price to sell. This was done by offering a menu of prices and profit sharing terms. Therefore, it was not corrupt, just hard to do. [We should have taken off points if you had said that this was corrupt, but we did not]

But considering the attitude of 郞咸平, there is indeed some corruption in the process of privation of the TVE.

How about your opinions?

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:中国企业改革 中国企业 企业改革 大家讨论 Considering 企业 中国 讨论 改革

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-9 06:00