Final ExamHomeworks
- Homework #4 | Homework #4 Data
- Homework #3 | Homework #3 Data
- Homework #2 | Homework #2 Data
- Homework #1 | Homework #1 Data
- R code for GIS | Data (San Francisco Voting Precincts) | R code for travel routing | Data (R Workspace for travel routing)
- R code for DiD, matching, RD | Data (Earned Income Tax Credit) | Data (Bridge Suicides) | Data (Incumbency Advantage)
- R code for multilevel models | Data (1992 U.S. Election Survey)
- R code for multiple imputation | Data (Central Coast Survey data) | Data (international development data)
- R code for selection models | Data (conflict data)
- R code for BTSCS data | Data (conflict data)
- R code for survival models | Data (coalition duration)
- R code for TSCS data | Data (Alvarez, Garrett, and Lange data)
- R code for instrumental variables | Data (Irish campaign data)
- R code for panel data | Data (British Election Study panel) | Data (Central bank data)
- Week 9: Difference-in-Difference, Matching, and Regression Discontinuity
- Card, David, and Krueger, Alan B. 1994. "Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania". American Economic Review 84: 772–793.
- Ho, Daniel E., Kosuke Imai, Gary King, and Elizabeth A. Stuart. 2007. "Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference." Political Analysis 15:199-236.
- Gerber, Elisabeth R., and Daniel J. Hopkins. 2011. "When Mayors Matter: Estimating the Impact of Mayoral Partisanship on City Policy." American Journal of Political Science 55:326-339.
- Week 8: Multilevel Models
- Jones, Bradford S. 2009. "Multilevel Modeling." In the The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, J. Box-Steffensmeier, H. Brady, and D. Collier (eds). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Steenbergen, Marco R., and Bradford S. Jones. 2002. "Modeling Multilevel Data Structures." American Journal of Political Science 46:218-237.
- Week 7: Multiple Imputation for Missing Data
- King, Gary, James Honaker, Anne Joseph, and Kenneth Scheve, 2001. "Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation." American Political Science Review 95:49-70
- Honaker, James, and Gary King. 2010. "What to do About Missing Values in Time Series Cross-Section Data." American Journal of Political Science 54:561-581.
- Week 6: Selection Models
- Berinksy, Adam. 1999. "The Two Faces of Public Opinion." American Journal of Political Science 43:1209-1230.
- Bushway, Shaun, Brian D. Johnson, and Lee Ann Slocum. 2007. "Is the Magic Still There? The Use of the Heckman Two-Step Correction for Selection Bias in Criminology." Journal of Quantitative Criminology 23:151-178.
- Dubin, Jeffrey A., and Douglas Rivers, 1990. "Selection Bias in Linear Regression, Logit, and Probit Models." Sociologial Methods and Research 18:360-390.
- Week 5: Binary TSCS Models
- Green, Donald P., Soo Yeon Kim, and David H. Yoon. 2001. "Dirty Pool" International Organization 55:441–468.
- Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 2001. "Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon." International Organization 55:487–495.
- Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. "Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable." American Journal of Political Science 42:1260-1288.
- Carter, David B., and Curtis S. Signorino. 2010. "Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data." Political Analysis 18:271-292.
- Week 4: Survival Models
- Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. and Bradford S. Jones. 1997. "Time is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science."American Journal of Political Science 45:972–988.
- Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. "Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable." American Journal of Political Science 42:1260-1288.
- Week 3: Nonspherical Errors in TSCS Data
- Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz, 1995. "What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data." American Political Science Review 89:634-647.
- Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz, 1996. "Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models." Political Analysis 6:1-36.
- Alvarez, R. Michael, Geoffrey Garrett, and Peter Lange, 1991. "Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance." American Political Science Review 85:539-556.
- Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, R. Michael Alvarez, Geoffrey Garrett, and Peter Lange, 1993. "Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance: A Corrigendum." American Political Science Review 87:945-948.
- Week 2: Instrumental Variables
- Benoit, Kenneth, and Michael Marsh. 2008. "The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending." American Journal of Political Science , 52:874-890.
- Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green. 2000. "The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment." American Political Science Review 94:653-663.
- Jacobson, Gary. 1978. "The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections." American Political Science Review72:469-491.
- Alvarez, R. Michael, and Garrett Glasgow. 1999. "Two-Stage Estimation of Non-Recursive Choice Models." Political Analysis8:147-165.
- Week 1: Panel Data
- Knack, Stephen, 1995. "Does 'Motor Voter' Work? Evidence from State-Level Data." Journal of Politics 57:796-811.
- Stimson, James A., 1985. "Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay." American Journal of Political Science 29:914-947.
- Worrall, John L. 2010. "A User-friendly Introduction to Panel Data Modeling." Journal of Criminal Justice Education 21:182-196.


雷达卡



京公网安备 11010802022788号







