楼主: liweimoon123
4522 13

[学科前沿] 博弈论 [推广有奖]

11
旗木卡卡西 发表于 2005-11-12 19:48:00
以下是引用liweimoon123在2005-11-12 17:46:04的发言:

麻烦大侠能再解释一下

There are three subgame perfect eq. in pure strategy:

Sj={b} St={b in b, d in d, k in k}

Sj={d} St={b in b, d in d, k in k}

Sj={k} St={b in b, d in d, k in k}

的含义吗?谢谢

Sj means Jerry's strategy, St means Tom's strategy.

The implication of Sj={b} means Jerry's strategy is to hide in bedroom.

St={b in b, d in d, k in k} means Tom's strategy is to search bedroom when Jerry hides in bedroom, to search den when Jerry hides in den, to search kitchen when Jerry hides in kitchen.

Note that strategy is a complete description of every information set, i.e. it must specifies the action in each information set!

So Tom must have 27 different strategies in question (a).

一想到经济学就头大……

12
liweimoon123 发表于 2005-11-12 22:57:00
could you please tell me the differences between subgame perfect equilibria and pure-stratery subgame perfect equilibria?

13
旗木卡卡西 发表于 2005-11-13 02:28:00
As the name is, the pure-strategy subgame perfect eq. is the subgame perfect eq. in pure strategies. But the subgame perfect eq. should consider the mixed strategies as well.
一想到经济学就头大……

14
liweimoon123 发表于 2005-11-14 00:35:00
谢谢大侠。这样的话,第二问中:how many pure-strategy subgame perfect equilibrium are theere? 应该是6个呢,还是24个。

15
旗木卡卡西 发表于 2005-11-14 02:19:00

I've given the right answer!

一想到经济学就头大……

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-24 22:05