楼主: tracy_shile
1083 4

[经济学基础] 急问一道题 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

初中生

47%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
28 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
114 点
帖子
12
精华
0
在线时间
10 小时
注册时间
2009-2-24
最后登录
2010-1-27

楼主
tracy_shile 发表于 2009-9-18 21:32:01 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
我不是很理解“rational”一词, 整个题目考什么点呢?谁能告诉我思路啊!谢谢!!!
In class we discussed a strange auction whereby a former Harvard professor auctioned off a $100 dollar bill. Whoever was willing to pay the highest for it would be the winner and would simply settle up with the professor by paying his bid. However, there was a strange twist to the game. Whoever had the second highest bid still had to pay the professor but did not get anything in return. I shared with you the results of the experiment and it turned out the winning bid was over $400. Explain how and why this was a rational outcome even though to a casual observer this seems quite absurd. Cite an example from life that seems remarkably similar to this situation? Make sure to explain how it is similar.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:experiment Professor Situation DISCUSSED Rational anything auction highest willing former

沙发
tracy_shile 发表于 2009-9-18 23:11:30
怎么没有人帮我啊……

藤椅
flydruid01 发表于 2009-9-19 12:07:43
因为,只要你多出一美元并且赢得拍卖,就会比前一次少损失98美元。如果两个人都这么想就会,标价就会越来越高。直到一方认为,另一方无论如何都要拿下竞标,因此无论自己标到多少,都难以获胜,只能失败,他就会退出。

板凳
seide_china 发表于 2009-10-7 04:13:23
rational 就是合理的意识啊。好像辞源是从定量过来的吧。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-26 02:11