楼主: yechunyi
1794 4

[社会学] The Death of Expertise-Tom Nichols [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 9粉丝

已卖:1622份资源

博士生

11%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
7117 个
通用积分
38.7526
学术水平
42 点
热心指数
41 点
信用等级
41 点
经验
5780 点
帖子
129
精华
0
在线时间
293 小时
注册时间
2006-2-8
最后登录
2025-12-28
毕业学校
南开大学

楼主
yechunyi 发表于 2017-5-20 12:35:08 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
The rise of the internet and other technology has made information more easily-accessible than ever before. While this has had the positive effect of equalizing access to knowledge, it also has lowered the bar on what depth of knowledge is required to consider oneself an "expert." A cult of anti-expertise sentiment has coincided with anti-intellectualism, resulting in massively viral yet poorly informed debates ranging from the anti-vaccination movement to attacks on GMOs. This surge in intellectual egalitarianism has altered the landscape of debates - all voices are equal, and "fact"
is a subjective term. Browsing WebMD puts one on equal footing with doctors, and Wikipedia allows all to be foreign policy experts, scientists, and more.

As Tom Nichols shows in The Death of Expertise, there are a number of reasons why this has occurred - ranging from easy access to Internet search engines to a customer satisfaction model within higher education. The product of these interrelated trends, Nichols argues, is a pervasive distrust of expertise among the public coinciding with an unfounded belief among non-experts that their opinions should have equal standing with those of the experts. The experts are not always right, of course, and Nichols discusses expert failure. The crucial point is that bad decisions by experts can and have been effectively challenged by other well-informed experts. The issue now is that the democratization of information dissemination has created an army of ill-informed citizens who denounce expertise.

When challenged, non-experts resort to the false argument that the experts are often wrong. Though it may be true, but the solution is not to jettison expertise as an ideal; it is to improve our expertise. Nichols is certainly not opposed to information democratization, but rather the enlightenment people believe they achieve after superficial internet research. He shows in vivid detail the ways in which this impulse is coursing through our culture and body politic, but the larger goal is to explain the benefits that expertise and rigorous learning regimes bestow upon all societies.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Nichols Expert Death chol CHO against

已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
Fanos + 3 + 3 + 3 精彩帖子

总评分: 学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 3   查看全部评分

沙发
水浪(未真实交易用户) 发表于 2017-5-21 09:09:49
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽

藤椅
Enthuse(真实交易用户) 发表于 2017-6-27 05:58:25
thanks ...

板凳
farheen(未真实交易用户) 发表于 2017-6-27 22:19:28
Expertise is a modern phenomenon. The recognition of experts and expertise is embedded in social culture. That is, the modern social culture created the institution of expertise and experts.
The problem is that the social culture has changed with the information technology and other social changes.
To revive the spirit and benefit of expertise, it is necessary to restore the modern culture.

报纸
slowry(未真实交易用户) 发表于 2018-4-6 09:40:45

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-6 21:50