奖励发帖：有关形成型和反映型的区别 [推广有奖]

11楼

zhudonghong 发表于 2010-10-10 21:43:50

[em17]

12楼

sphill 发表于 2011-1-10 01:05:36

超感激大大分享!!!

13楼

charles576 发表于 2011-5-1 11:26:38

楼上的怎么没有被奖励啊？现在才有77个论坛币？版主怎么回事呢？

14楼

zyx781006 发表于 2011-8-2 16:51:12

大家相互学习，资料真是不错

15楼

zly05 发表于 2011-11-15 17:35:46

不错的资料，谢谢分享

16楼

huayuyang 发表于 2012-5-18 10:04:30

看看

17楼

xiexie1111 发表于 2012-7-2 03:46:41

downloaded to learn, thanks for your sharing.

18楼

maojoey 发表于 2013-10-21 15:27:45

发表在MISQ上的这篇文章是IS领域关于形成性指标的一些要求，提出了形成性指标在IS领域应用的问题，对比了形成性和反应性指标的区别，很有借鉴意义。

Title: Specifying formative constructs in information systems research
Author: Petter, S.; Straub, D.; Rai, A.
Source: Mis Quarterly, 2007, 31(4): 623-656
Abstract
While researchers go to great lengths to justify and prove theoretical links between constructs, the relationship between measurement items and constructs is often ignored. By default, the relationship between construct and item is assumed to be reflective, meaning that the measurement items are a reflection of the construct. Many times, though, the nature of the construct is not reflective, but rather formative. Formative constructs occur when the items describe and define the construct rather than vice versa.
In this research, we examine whether formative constructs are indeed being mistaken for reflective constructs by information systems researchers. By examining complete volumes of MIS Quarterly and Information Systems Research over the last 3 years, we discovered that a significant number of articles have indeed misspecified formative constructs. For scientific results to be valid, we argue that researchers must properly specify formative constructs. This paper discusses the implications of different patterns of common misspecifications of formative constructs on both Type I and Type II errors. To avoid these errors, the paper provides a roadmap to researchers to properly specify formative constructs. We also discuss how to address formative constructs within a research model after they are specified.

下载