20190201【充实计划】第969期

充实每一天 发表于 2019-2-1 20:40
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/t_cOnS8Noums8AswJjy4tQ

云计算

昨日阅读2小时，累计阅读814小时      
挑战第三百二十九天   读15页书，完成当日目标

充实每一天 发表于 2019-2-1 06:42
【加入充实计划】【了解充实计划】
|新充实挑战|    |每日计划清单|
| 【充实积累】| |【充实挑战项目】| ...

昨天阅读1小时，累计阅读474小时。《宽客人生》，阅读时间比较短，没发现值得记录的内容。

昨日阅读1小时，累积阅读170小时

昨日阅读1小时，累积阅读396小时

昨日阅读时间1小时，总阅读时间101小时

昨天阅读2小时, 累计阅读230小时
阅读2小时-O Done.  完成
Read Materials: Harvard Business Review USA 2015 -05 Strategy : Tesla’s not as disruptive as you might think
Reflection: disruptive innovation describes how firms that introduce rudimentary products can eventally overrun established players by systematically improving the products until they meet the needs of mainstream consumers, generally at lower prices.  Musk is outspoken about his goal : to create an affordable mass-market electric vehicle that will supplant gasoline-powered cars. Five questions had been posted to evaluate disruptive innovation.
        First, does the product either target overserved customers (by offering lower performance at a lower price ) or create a new market ( by targeting customers who could not use or afford the existing product)?
        Second, does it create asymmetric motivation meaning that while the disrupter is motivated to either higher performance segments over time, existing players are not motivated to fight it?
        Third, can it improve performance fast enough to keep pace with customer’s expectations while retaining its low cost structure?
        Fourth, does it create new value networks, including sales and channels?
        Fifth, does it disrupt al incumbents or can an existing player exploit this opportunity?
It is clear that Tesla is a classic sustaining innovation,  a product that offers incrementally better performance at a higher price.

This paper was issued on May,2015. Let us revisit this case and topic again. Whether tesla is a disruptive innovation. For question1,2 and 4, the output is still negative. The output of question 3 had been changed since the market environment had been changed. The sense of environmental protection is waking up gradually. However the bottleneck is the battery. How to handle the battery is still a question mark.

昨天阅读2小时，一共阅读1068小时！
今天的主要任务：今天白天在医院陪媳妇，晚上8点一切才收拾完整，继续读一会《高微》。
今天的杂事：1..陪媳妇去医院。
告诉自己：回眸昔岁催奋进，不忘初心再出发！！！战胜自己才是最大的成功！与其焦虑的思考，不如静心的实干！

1.每日在最新【充实计划】主题帖跟帖，【每日计划清单】，并填写是否完成（O or X）
2.计划清单形式（范例）：
【昨日计划完成情况】
情况说明，昨天上午阅读2小时，下午和晚上一直在医院陪媳妇，今天白天也是，晚上开始看会书

1.阅读《高微》第6章。-O
2.杂事完成。-O
3.晚上查阅外国文献没有读完。-X
4.阅读《应用经济学研究方法论》第7章知识梳理。-X
O表示完成，X表示未完成

充实每一天 发表于 2019-2-1 06:42
【加入充实计划】【了解充实计划】
|新充实挑战|    |每日计划清单|
| 【充实积累】| |【充实挑战项目】| ...

昨日阅读2小时，累计阅读1072小时。

昨日阅读 4 h，累计 591.5 h
==================
《思想的力量：哲学导论》

340. 功能主义者认为，对于信念及及其他精神现象的分析必须依据功能，而不是采取还原的方式。
功能主义对 这一现象作出了令人满意的解释：心理学----无论是日常意义上的还是科学领域的----何以拒绝被还原为神经学。这样的拒绝之所以存在，并非因为心理状态是非物理性的，而是因为它们是功能性的。这样为心理学研究提供了一个概念框架：一方面，令研究者们无需涉足暧昧不明、颇受争议的二元论形而上学思想，另一方面，另研究者们无需接受这种靠不住的观点（心理学就像化学一样，可以被还原为物理学）。

341. 彻底的还原论物理主义（straightforward reductivist physicalism），简而言之，就是物理主义还原论（physicalist reductivism）
行为主义，同一性理论和功能主义，这些都是20世纪的分析哲学家发展出来的关于心灵的非二元论理论。

大部分研究心灵问题的分析哲学家（不包括认知心理学家和人工智能研究者）基本上都认同某些物理主义的心灵理论（通常是功能主义）。
他们注意到物理主义理论中也有些有待解决的哲学问题。

342. 21世纪英语世界的哲学将何去何从？可以肯定的是，心灵哲学仍将占据重要领域；而罗蒂等人引入的实用主义视角是否能继续保持其影响力，有待时间来检验。

343. 要点
C.S.皮尔士----主张“一个理智观念的意义取决于：倘若这个观点是真的，那么由它可以得出怎样的实际效果；观点的意义无非就是它的实际效果的总和。”
威廉-詹姆士----他说：“哲学的全部功能应当就是对世界观作出考察：这个世界观或那个世界观为真，会对人生的特定层面造成何种明确的影响。”
约翰-杜威----一位工具主义着，主张思考的目的不是寻求”真理“，而是解决实践问题。他认为形而上学是逃避现实。
伯特兰-罗素----主张分析是通向形而上学真理的关键所在。试图在得自感知经验的”硬“材料和所谓的外部的物理对象之间建立起联系。
戈特洛布-弗雷格---一位德国数学家，现代数理逻辑的创始人。独立于罗素开始创建逻辑主义的工作，人们常把他视为分析哲学的创始人。
路德维希-维特根斯坦----通过对语言与世界之关系的思考推演出了一套逻辑原子主义形而上学。曾经主张意义的图像理论，后来抛弃了这一观点。
==========================
Blockchain：
14.

Transaction

A transaction is the process of transferring data from one address in blockchain to another address. In Bitcoin, it is about transferring Bitcoins from one address to another address. All the transactions happening in blockchain are registered from the start of the chain till the current time; this information is shared across the network and all the P2P nodes. The transaction is confirmed by miners, who are economically compensated for their work.
Each transaction in a blockchain goes through a number of confirmations, as they are the consensus of a transaction. Without confirmation, no transaction can be validated.

Nodes

Nodes are part of a blockchain network and perform functions as assigned to them. Any device connected to the Bitcoin network can be called a node.
Nodes that are integral components of the network and validate all the rules of the blockchain are called full nodes. Another type of Node is called a super node, which acts as a highly connected redistribution point, as well as a relay station.
=============
Django： 5 pages

=================
昨日阅读 4 h
累计 591.5 h