楼主: roncwm_massey
3310 16

请斑竹帮助我解答,可能这里没有人会这个个问题 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 1粉丝

已卖:220份资源

硕士生

4%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
1431 个
通用积分
0.5200
学术水平
4 点
热心指数
5 点
信用等级
5 点
经验
1276 点
帖子
139
精华
0
在线时间
36 小时
注册时间
2006-2-22
最后登录
2024-8-4

楼主
roncwm_massey 发表于 2006-3-10 11:16:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

两个问题: 我是初学者,谁能彻底解释DEGREES OF FREEDOM的含义?谢谢了

哪位大虾在帮我解释一下, ZERO CONDITIONAL MEAN的assumption 意义!MANY THANKS

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:conditional assumption condition Freedom thanks 解答 斑竹

回帖推荐

zhaosweden 发表于7楼  查看完整内容

from ANOVA table point of view, The sum of square due to estimation (ESS) is [S]y(i)_hat^2=b2_hat^2 * [S]x(i)^2, where [S] is the usual sigma, summation sign. the df for this item is one. This is understood as follows. we assume x(i) are known (pre-dertermined or conditioning variables), so df has nothing to do with this (some sort of). we say that b2_hat has one df because we have shown that b2 ...

zhaosweden 发表于6楼  查看完整内容

Now instead of (*1), we work with deviations y(i) and x(i), the new model of interest becomes y(i)=b2*x(i)+u(i), i=1,...,n-1 (*2) where the No. of Obs. isnow n-1, because when I take the mean, I lose one observations or, one df. in order to have b2_hat, we also need to impose one constraint over the systems. what's that. In view of OLS, we need the sum of residuals to be zero. this can be at ...

zhaosweden 发表于5楼  查看完整内容

Let me try to give you some ideas. Suppose you have Y(i)=b1+b2*X(i)+e(i), i=1,...,n (*1) also denote x(i)=X(i)-X_bar, where X_bar is the sample mean of X(i), simialrly for y(i). for ease of exposition, when thinking about degrees of freedom(hereafter, df), only look at Y(i), or y(i). Now if you estimate the sample mean of Y(i), i.e., Y_bar, you lose one df. Why? take a simple example. suppose ...

本帖被以下文库推荐

沙发
gloryfly 在职认证  发表于 2006-3-10 11:30:00
你这么提问,人家谁还会回答阿~~
你们世俗的人都认为大侠是玉树临风的 难道 大侠就不能矮胖吗?

藤椅
hangzh 发表于 2006-3-10 18:51:00

你这么提问,人家谁还会回答阿~~

DEGREES OF FREEDOM在论坛上搜一下呗

板凳
roncwm_massey 发表于 2006-3-10 18:57:00
为我的提问方式感到歉意,我同样的问题已经提了好几次可是没有给予回答.给我感觉大家都在买卖东西. 我想人大的这个论坛存在在于学术探讨和帮助象我这样的"后进生". 苦于想知道答案所以才这么问的.望大家原谅

报纸
zhaosweden 发表于 2006-3-11 21:20:00

Let me try to give you some ideas.

Suppose you have Y(i)=b1+b2*X(i)+e(i), i=1,...,n (*1)

also denote x(i)=X(i)-X_bar, where X_bar is the sample mean of X(i), simialrly for y(i).

for ease of exposition, when thinking about degrees of freedom(hereafter, df), only look at Y(i), or y(i).

Now if you estimate the sample mean of Y(i), i.e., Y_bar, you lose one df. Why? take a simple example. suppose you have 4 numbers, But I tell you that the sample mean is (say) 5. I ask 4 students choose such 4 numbers such that the sample mean is 5. The students are free to choose any number, The 1st student is happy, the 2nd is happy, the 3rd is happy... now suppose the first three numbers chosen are 10, -2, 4, then the sum is 12. The 4th student is not happy because she must to choose 8 such that the average is 5 is satisfied. So we have 4 "observations", but in order to have the mean, we lose one df.

Note that this is some sort of constraints (i.e. to calculate the sample mean).

I also note that estimate parameters in the mdoel can also be viewed constraints.

When you estimate one parameter, e.g. b1 in (*1), you impose one constraint upon the system.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-3-12 3:25:29编辑过]

已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 收起 理由
胖胖小龟宝 + 20 + 20 热心帮助其他会员

总评分: 经验 + 20  论坛币 + 20   查看全部评分

地板
zhaosweden 发表于 2006-3-11 21:28:00

Now instead of (*1), we work with deviations y(i) and x(i), the new model of interest becomes

y(i)=b2*x(i)+u(i), i=1,...,n-1 (*2)

where the No. of Obs. isnow n-1, because when I take the mean, I lose one observations or, one df.

in order to have b2_hat, we also need to impose one constraint over the systems. what's that.

In view of OLS, we need the sum of residuals to be zero. this can be attacked thus: in x-y plane, there is a line with posi. slope, n-1 points is scattered around this fitted line. suppose n-1=10. then loosely speaking, then first 9 point is somhow free, but the last one can only be somewhere which has been determined by other 9 points such that the sum of residuals is zero. like the exmple for mean given in Floor 5 (F5).

So the idea is that estiamting b2 can also be thought of imposing one constraint over th system/model.

SImilarly, for b3, b4, if you have.

7
zhaosweden 发表于 2006-3-11 21:43:00

from ANOVA table point of view,

The sum of square due to estimation (ESS) is [S]y(i)_hat^2=b2_hat^2 * [S]x(i)^2, where [S] is the usual sigma, summation sign. the df for this item is one. This is understood as follows. we assume x(i) are known (pre-dertermined or conditioning variables), so df has nothing to do with this (some sort of). we say that b2_hat has one df because we have shown that b2 has taken one df. so we think b2_hat "holds" one df. since ESS is a function of b2_hat only, so ESS has one df.

Note that if b2_hat holds one df, so is b2_hat^2, or f(b2_hat), where f(.) is a well behaved function.

Let us come to Residual sum f sqaures (RSS). RSS=[S]u(i)_hat^2. we initially have n obs. but taking mean of Y(i) takes one df away (such that we have b1_hat, the intercept), estimating b2 also reduces one df. now only n-2 df are left for RSS.

The Total sum of sqaures, TSS=[S]y(i)^2 has n-1 df since we started from Y(i), took mean of Y(i), we lost one df when we calculate Y_bar. So n-1 df for TSS.

any standard text should have something akin to the above. Then this makes life simple when it comes to F test. the numerater df is 1 and the df for the denominator is n-2, such that the F(1),(n-2) is in order.

8
zhaosweden 发表于 2006-3-11 21:45:00
Similarly for t statistic, Chi-2 one because such r.v.s are intimated linked to normal r.v.

9
zhaosweden 发表于 2006-3-11 21:47:00

Some other intuition provoking comments

(1) degrees of freedom are the equivalent of currency in statistics - you earn a degree of freedom for every data point you collect, and you spend a degree of freedom for each parameter you estimate. Since you ususally need to spend 1 just to calcultae the mean, you then are left with n-1 (total data points "n" - 1 spent on calculating the mean).

(2)

Another way of thinking about degrees of freedom is to image that you ask 100 people to pick a number between -infinity and infinity so that the mean of all the numbers is exactly zero. 99 of the people can pick any number they want, but the 100th person HAS to pick a specific number. He is not "free" to pick what he wants. Thus the degrees of freedom to determine the mean for 100 samples is n-1 or 99.

(3)

If you have A + B = 30 and you define A = 10 then you can have just one degree of fredom (n-1), because B can be only 20.

If you have A + B + C =30 and A is always =10, now you have 2 degree of freedom (B, C) because B and C can be many different values to satisfy the equation.

And so on ...

Apologies for the simplicity

(4)

The degrees of freedom are related to the sum of squares ( SS)

SS= sum[ (yi-ybar)^2] when i is from 1 to n

Since, sum[yi - ybar] = 0 when i is from 1 to n , consists the sum of squares of n elements. These elements are not all independent. As a result, only n-1 elements are independent, implying that SS has n-1 degrees of freedom. That's the mathemathical explanation.

10
zhaosweden 发表于 2006-3-11 21:49:00
(5)(some strange English words?)

Perhaps a physical depiction will help clarify this concept. Take a piece of rope and hold the two ends. Now twirl it (like you did in high/junior school gym) so that it starts moving in the middle (like a skipping rope). You had two nodes and when you twirl it you find that the rope is able to move at one point only. It has the freedom to move at one point only! It has two nodes and one degree of freedom. Now ask someone to hold it at the center point thus creating another node; you now have 3 nodes. If you try twirling it now, you find that the rope can be twirled at 2 points. Three nodes, two degrees of freedom!!

This might be a real basic explanation and mathematicians might disagree with me, but it beats any other way of explaining Degrees of Freedom.

(6)

You could think of Degrees of Freedom as the amount of information available for the estimation of variability. For example, the degrees of freedom to estimate variability from one observation would be zero, i.e., it is impossible to estimate variability. But for each observation after the first, you get one addtional degree of freedom to estimate variance. Hope this helps.

(7)

Each data point adds one DOF. Each constrain (or 'relationship' or 'equation' such as ybar=sum(yi)) reduce one DOF. Find the data points number, then minus the constrains number, you get the number of freedom.

e.g.: for SSt, it contains all n data points, with one constrain (ybar), therefore, DOF = n-1

Constrains and combination of constrains always hold one DOF.

e.g.: (ybar+std.dev) has 1 DOF.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-5 19:32