楼主: john111222
8046 5

[其他] 生存者偏差具体是什么意思! [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

本科生

63%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
49 个
通用积分
0.0001
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
1296 点
帖子
86
精华
0
在线时间
39 小时
注册时间
2008-9-28
最后登录
2012-6-18

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
请求高人指点,生存者偏差具体是什么意思!
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:是什么意思 生存者 求高人指点 高人指点 生存者

沙发
垃圾树 发表于 2010-3-18 08:54:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
在做资本市场实证的时候如果样本的选取只保留当前在市场上的证券,那么那些被淘汰掉的证券就没有算进样本,导致证券的收益率高于市场的实际情况。如果实证的期限较长,退市的公司较多,生存者偏差就会比较严重
已有 1 人评分热心指数 收起 理由
holdser + 1 好的意见建议

总评分: 热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

使用道具

藤椅
wxjie2006 发表于 2010-3-22 15:25:33 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
Survivorship bias is the logical error of concentrating on the people or things that "survived" some process and ignoring those that didn't. This can lead to false conclusions in several different ways. The survivors may literally be people, as in a medical study, or could be companies or research subjects or applicants for a job, or anything that must make it past some selection process to be considered further.

Survivorship bias can lead to overly optimistic beliefs because failures are ignored, such as when companies that no longer exist are excluded from analyses of financial performance. It can also lead to the false belief that the successes in a group have some special property, rather than being just lucky. For example, if the three of the five students with the best college grades went to the same high school, that can lead one to believe that the high school must offer an excellent education. This could be true, but the question cannot be answered without looking at the grades of all the other students from that high school, not just the ones who "survived" the top-five selection process.

使用道具

板凳
081015042 发表于 2010-3-22 15:32:12 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
In finance, Survial bias is the tendency for failed companies to be excluded from performance studies because they no longer exist. It often causes the results of studies to skew higher because only companies which were successful enough to survive until the end of the period are included.

For example, a mutual fund company's selection of funds today will include only those that are successful now. Many losing funds are closed and merged into other funds to hide poor performance. In theory, 90% of extant funds could truthfully claim to have performance in the first quartile of their peers if the peer group includes funds that have closed.

In 1996 Elton, Gruber, & Blake showed that survivorship bias is larger in the small-fund sector than in large mutual funds (presumably because small funds have a high probability of folding).They estimate the size of the bias across the U.S. mutual fund industry as 0.9% per annum, where the bias is defined and measured as:

"Bias is defined as average α for surviving funds minus average α for all funds"
(Where α is the risk-adjusted return over the S&P 500. This is the standard measure of mutual fund out-performance).

使用道具

报纸
john111222 发表于 2010-4-7 10:06:45 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
感谢各位啊!解释的很详细,多谢啦!

使用道具

地板
zl030739 发表于 2014-11-11 16:01:49 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
如何解决这个问题呢?有什么计量方法吗?

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jr
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-6-27 06:54