楼主: red123star
1491 5

[营销类] 求助一篇文献The Effects of a Government’s Subsidy Program: Accessibility Beyond [推广有奖]

已卖:2135份资源

教授

52%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
3281 个
通用积分
58.4374
学术水平
13 点
热心指数
7 点
信用等级
8 点
经验
16199 点
帖子
621
精华
0
在线时间
924 小时
注册时间
2009-10-16
最后登录
2025-10-21

楼主
red123star 发表于 2019-12-12 14:53:12 |AI写论文
55论坛币
The Effects of a Government’s Subsidy Program: Accessibility Beyond Affordability[size=0.875]Ping Xiao
, Ruli Xiao
, Yitian (Sky) Liang
, Xinlei (Jack) Chen
, Wei Lu




https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3334?af=R&
Rural consumers may face not only the challenge of affordability but also the problem of limited accessibility. Can a government’s subsidy program effectively address these issues? This paper examines the impact of a large-scale subsidy program, “Household electrical appliances going to the countryside,” offered by the Chinese government. The government regulation imposes a price subsidy combined with a price ceiling on products in the program. We consider two effects of the subsidy: the retail price is lowered to make the product more affordable to consumers, and manufacturers are encouraged to expand their distribution coverage to make products more accessible to consumers. We build a dynamic model of oligopoly to study how firms adjust their distribution coverage. Conditional on the model estimates, we evaluate the program’s effects on social welfare, consumer surplus, and firms’ market performance and marketing channel decisions through counterfactual analyses. We find that the subsidy program increases social welfare by CNY 0.209 billion, as a result of a subsidy expense of CNY 0.236 billion. When breaking down the impact, we find it increases consumer surplus by CNY 0.184 billion (50%), manufacturers’ profits by CNY 0.125 billion (53%), and manufacturers’ payoffs by CNY 2.5 million (17%). Specifically, 14% (13.2%) of the consumer surplus (firm profit) increases are from changes in distribution coverage, and the rest is from the subsidy (price changes). The program’s return of investment (i.e., social welfare minus subsidy expense), which is negative, however, could be improved by applying a relatively lower subsidy rate.

最佳答案

double2u 查看完整内容

“已发送邮箱”
关键词:GOVERNMENT Subsidy effects Program access

沙发
double2u 发表于 2019-12-12 14:53:13
“已发送邮箱”

藤椅
甲乙丙丁戊123 发表于 2019-12-12 16:13:28
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
admin_kefu + 30 精彩帖子

总评分: 论坛币 + 30   查看全部评分

板凳
wangzhenqau 发表于 2019-12-12 19:21:54
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
admin_kefu + 20 精彩帖子

总评分: 论坛币 + 20   查看全部评分

报纸
漂亮的花花 发表于 2019-12-13 09:59:29 来自手机
red123star 发表于 2019-12-12 14:53
The Effects of a Government’s Subsidy Program: Accessibility Beyond AffordabilityPing X ...
谢谢楼主分享

地板
wangzhenqau 发表于 2019-12-13 21:30:04
漂亮的花花 发表于 2019-12-13 09:59
谢谢楼主分享
不客气!!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-2 18:56