楼主: 营销战略044
827 0

[英文文献] Efficiency, Non-permanence and Additionality- A Study on Payment Systems to... [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-22
最后登录
2020-9-22

楼主
营销战略044 发表于 2006-3-21 01:00:34 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Efficiency, Non-permanence and Additionality- A Study on Payment Systems to Carbon Sequestration-效率、非永久性和额外性——碳封存支付系统研究本文试图理解建立碳封存激励机制的政策背后的机制
英文文献作者:Tian, Xiaohui
英文文献摘要:
This paper seeks to understand the mechanisms underlying the policies creating incentives for carbon sequestration. The key difficulty in designing carbon policies for forests is to take into account the ephemeral nature of carbon sequestration and to accurately track the carbon flow entering and exiting forests. Among a number of existing payment systems, carbon subsidy-tax system (CST) and carbon rental system are the only two systems which both consider nonpermanence and accurately track the forest carbon flow. In this paper, we derive the optimal conditions for harvests under various carbon policies and simulate the effects in a single region, multi age class timber market model. We find that carbon policy will encourage afforestation if it create additional revenue but the CST and carbon rental system are more effective than the others in extending rotation ages. Another finding is that costs of carbon rental system are much higher than that of CST system although they are efficiently equivalent.

制定森林碳政策的关键困难在于考虑到碳封存的短暂性,并准确跟踪进出森林的碳流量。在现有的支付体系中,只有碳补贴税(CST)和碳租赁制度既考虑了非永久性,又能准确地跟踪森林碳流量。在本文中,我们推导了不同碳政策下的最优收获条件,并模拟了单一地区、多年龄段木材市场模型的效果。我们发现,碳政策如果能创造额外的收入,就会鼓励植树造林,但CST和碳租赁制度在延长循环年限方面比其他制度更有效。另一个发现是碳租赁系统的成本远高于CST系统,尽管两者效率相当。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-2-18 06:07