The impact of cash and food transfers: Evidence from a randomized intervent...

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

英文文献：The impact of cash and food transfers: Evidence from a randomized intervention in Niger-现金和粮食转移的影响:来自尼日尔随机干预的证据
英文文献作者：Hoddinott, John,Sandstrom, Susanna,Upton, Joanna
英文文献摘要：
We assess the relative impacts of receiving cash versus food transfers using a randomized design. Drawing on data collected in eastern Niger, we find that households randomized to receive a food basket experienced larger, positive impact on measures of food consumption and diet quality than those receiving the cash transfer. Other outcomes showed greater variation by season. Receiving food reduced the use of a number of coping strategies but this effect was more pronounced during the height of the lean season. Households receiving cash spent more money repairing their dwellings prior to the start of the rainy season and spent more on agricultural inputs during the growing season. Less than five percent of food was sold or exchanged for other goods. Food and cash were delivered with the same degree of frequency and timeliness but the food transfers cost 15 percent more to implement.

我们采用随机设计评估了接受现金和食物转移的相对影响。根据在尼日尔东部收集的数据，我们发现，与接受现金转移的家庭相比，随机接受食品篮的家庭对食品消费和饮食质量的衡量有更大的积极影响。其他研究结果显示，季节差异更大。接受食物减少了一些应对策略的使用，但这种影响在淡季最严重的时候更为明显。收到现金的家庭在雨季开始前花了更多的钱来修缮他们的住所，在种植季节花了更多的钱在农业投入上。不到5%的食品被出售或交换为其他商品。食品和现金运送的频率和及时性是一样的，但食品转移的执行成本要高出15%。

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏0 回帖