楼主: 需求函数694
7751 0

[英文文献] Distribution of Social Benefits with Optimal Control of U.S. Wheat Stocks [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-22
最后登录
2020-9-22

楼主
需求函数694 发表于 2006-4-25 11:08:20 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Distribution of Social Benefits with Optimal Control of U.S. Wheat Stocks
英文文献作者:Koo, Won W.,Burt, Oscar R.
英文文献摘要:
One of the most important objectives in a grain storage program is to achieve the price stabilization. Consequently, a fundamental question associated with a storage program is who benefits and who loses from the price stabilization. Many studies have been published to answer this question. Waugh (13) took his proposition in early 1940 that consumers are better, off from the price in stabilization than the prices stabilized at their mean if the source of price instability is stochastic fluctuations in supply. Some years later, Oi (11) demonstrated that producers facing random price due to stochastic shift in demand are worse off from having prices stabilized at their mean. These two studies considered the welfare of one group only and ignored effects of price stabilization on the other group. Massell (10) put consumers and producers together in a single framework under the assumption that demand and supply curves are linear with additive stochastic disturbances. According to his study, welfare gains to each group are indeterminate and depend upon the relative size of variances and the slope of the demand and supply curves. A limitation of this study is the assumption of linear, supply and demand curves with additive stochastic disturbances which are not always true in application.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-2-17 21:46