发帖
雷达卡
英文文献：Credibility and Legitimacy in Policy-driven Innovation Networks: Resource dependencies and expectations in Dutch electric subsidies-政策驱动的创新网络中的可信度和合法性:荷兰电力补贴中的资源依赖和预期
英文文献作者：Frank J. van Rijnsoever,Leon Welle,Sjoerd Bakker
英文文献摘要：
The aim of this paper is to empirically examine the influence of different types of credibility on the legitimacy to grant individual actors within consortia an innovation subsidy. Theorizing from the viewpoint of resource dependence theory and the sociology of expectations, we hypothesize that four types of credibility are related to legitimacy: scientific credibility, market credibility, expectation track record, and social capital. We operate on two levels of analysis, the actor and the consortium. We quantitatively analyze the Dutch electric vehicle subsidy program as case. We develop a model that accurately forecasts which consortia are most likely to receive subsidies. We demonstrate that social capital and market credibility positively influence the likelihood of receiving innovation subsidies, while scientific credibility sources and expectation track record have a negative influence. Based on these findings we provide policy recommendations and avenues for further research.
摘要本文的目的是实证研究不同类型的可信度对财团内部个体行动者的创新补贴合法性的影响。从资源依赖理论和期望社会学的观点出发，我们假设四种类型的可信性与合法性相关:科学可信性、市场可信性、期望跟踪记录和社会资本。我们在两个层面上进行分析，行动者和联盟。以荷兰电动汽车补贴为例，定量分析了荷兰的电动汽车补贴政策。我们开发了一个模型，可以准确预测哪些财团最有可能获得补贴。我们证明，社会资本和市场可信度对创新补贴的可能性有正向影响，而科学可信度来源和预期跟踪记录则有负向影响。基于这些发现，我们为进一步的研究提供政策建议和途径。
京公网安备 11010802022788号
