楼主: 物流专业846
487 0

[英文文献] Quality Responses to Agricultural Policies [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-22
最后登录
2020-9-22

楼主
物流专业846 发表于 2006-5-15 09:45:46 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Quality Responses to Agricultural Policies
英文文献作者:James, Jennifer S.
英文文献摘要:
Most policy analyses are conducted using a model of a single market for a homogeneous commodity. Usually, the commodity of interest is not truly homogeneous, but the homogeneity assumption is imposed for the sake of simplicity. In doing so, analysts are implicitly assuming that a single-market model of a homogeneous product closely approximates true policy effects. This paper explores the implications of this assumption. The effects of the homogeneity assumption are shown for the simple case of a product available in two qualities, when market-distorting policies are introduced. It is shown that, for plausible parameter values, ignoring quality responses can have substantial impacts on the estimated welfare effects of policies. In addition, for a given transfer to producers, a model that incorporates quality responses to policies will imply different settings for policy instruments than a model of a homogeneous commodity, and in some cases, different instruments. For some transfers, including quality responses will switch the ranking of policies.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-28 18:47