摘要翻译:
与许多其他发展中国家一样,印度的特点是非正规劳动力在其总劳动力中占很大比例。根据2011-2012年《国家统计报告》关于就业和失业的第68轮计算,非正规劳动力的百分比接近总数的92%。许多传统和地理因素可能是造成我国非正规人口比例惊人的原因。作为本研究的一部分,我们主要关注于了解非正规性是如何随地区、部门、性别、社会群体和工作年龄群体而变化的。此外,我们还研究了正规和非正规劳动如何造成总的不平等,以及职业/行业在多大程度上分别造成了正规和非正规劳动群体中的不平等。在我们的研究中,我们使用了NSSO关于就业和失业的第61轮(2004-05)和第68轮(2011-12)。这项研究旨在观察非正式性的总体情况,并根据数据突出从数据中可见的任何推断。
---
英文标题:
《Informal Labour in India》
---
作者:
Vinay Reddy Venumuddala
---
最新提交年份:
2020
---
分类信息:
一级分类:Economics 经济学
二级分类:General Economics 一般经济学
分类描述:General methodological, applied, and empirical contributions to economics.
对经济学的一般方法、应用和经验贡献。
--
一级分类:Quantitative Finance 数量金融学
二级分类:Economics 经济学
分类描述:q-fin.EC is an alias for econ.GN. Economics, including micro and macro economics, international economics, theory of the firm, labor economics, and other economic topics outside finance
q-fin.ec是econ.gn的别名。经济学,包括微观和宏观经济学、国际经济学、企业理论、劳动经济学和其他金融以外的经济专题
--
---
英文摘要:
India like many other developing countries is characterized by huge proportion of informal labour in its total workforce. The percentage of Informal Workforce is close to 92% of total as computed from NSSO 68th round on Employment and Unemployment, 2011-12. There are many traditional and geographical factors which might have been responsible for this staggering proportion of Informality in our country. As a part of this study, we focus mainly on finding out how Informality varies with Region, Sector, Gender, Social Group, and Working Age Groups. Further we look at how Total Inequality is contributed by Formal and Informal Labour, and how much do occupations/industries contribute to inequality within each of formal and informal labour groups separately. For the purposes of our study we use NSSO rounds 61 (2004-05) and 68 (2011-12) on employment and unemployment. The study intends to look at an overall picture of Informality, and based on the data highlight any inferences which are visible from the data.
---
PDF链接:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.06795