tag 标签: possibly经管大学堂:名校名师名课

相关帖子

版块 作者 回复/查看 最后发表
Xtscc命令用于大N小T的数据还是大T小N的数据? Stata专版 ttangssong 2014-5-22 3 8162 lm8 2024-11-3 12:32:22
固定效应的虚拟变量被忽略、豪斯曼检验结果为0.000 Stata专版 warriorzhangyp 2014-3-20 11 10367 你好我是赵昭昭 2022-2-13 19:44:17
The Art of Execution: How the world's best investors get it wrong attachment 金融实务版 nelsoncwlee 2015-9-28 5 2934 atcoolman 2021-11-6 19:07:31
悬赏 in vitro biotransformation and investigation of metabolic enzymes possibly respo - [!reward_solved!] attachment 求助成功区 xyz15110139 2015-5-21 3 840 Mengguren15 2019-2-11 20:41:04
Fluent Python attach_img python论坛 大家开心 2015-8-1 33 9092 Enthuse 2017-3-2 00:47:24
悬赏 New tests for unit roots in autoregressive processes possibly infinite varia - [!reward_solved!] attachment 求助成功区 dandan0407 2015-11-18 3 971 ftdfeiyang 2015-11-18 19:27:56
Beginning Oracle SQL: For Oracle Database 12c attachment SQL及关系型数据库数据分析 lasgpope 2015-5-31 8 2333 qingxunz 2015-6-6 08:35:33
求教:R+ubuntu+mysql R语言论坛 mrhe261314 2013-8-5 2 2635 DM小菜鸟 2015-2-14 15:06:53
悬赏 求sciencedirect上文献一篇Information criteria for selecting possibly misspecifie - [!reward_solved!] attachment 求助成功区 mgymgy 2015-2-4 2 1051 Meng_Hui 2015-2-4 17:07:10
一篇英文投稿的复信,请行家帮忙看下。 学术道德监督 无者歌之 2014-6-12 15 3452 shaneshane 2014-6-13 11:02:58
纠结的百度金融,未来何去何从想好没? 金融实务版 倚天照 2014-6-10 0 898 倚天照 2014-6-10 11:02:46
logistic回归出现问题,请大师指教 SAS专版 xiezhibin 2014-4-4 3 4966 yuerqieqie 2014-4-4 22:20:33
Renminbi Rising? 真实世界经济学(含财经时事) gongtianyu 2013-12-14 1 1525 gongtianyu 2013-12-14 12:11:15
悬赏 求助JOE文献+Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integr - [!reward_solved!] attachment 求助成功区 zhaomn200145 2013-3-22 5 1226 Toyotomi 2013-3-23 08:45:56
2011年一篇SCI论文的投稿过程 attachment 学术资源/课程/会议/讲座 sql2002 2012-8-9 4 1532 z330843564 2012-8-16 15:43:45
悬赏 ifenprodil注射液的英文文献 ,求助,每篇20币 - [悬赏 1 个论坛币] 文献求助专区 koushaodawang 2012-3-26 3 1480 4067560 2012-3-26 15:46:52

相关日志

分享 Presenting The Fundamental Flaw In The Fed's Thinking
insight 2012-10-21 11:39
Presenting The Fundamental Flaw In The Fed's Thinking Submitted by Tyler Durden on 06/20/2012 15:15 -0400 This one simple chart below shows what is possibly the biggest and most fundamental flaw in Bernanke's approach to spurring the economy, which to him, of course, means rising prices of risky assets, aka the stock market. The chart above shows the return of two simple things: the return of 4.25% 30 Year Bond issued November 2010... and the SP. As is vividly shown on the chart, the return of the long-bond is nearly three times greater than that of the broader equity market in 18 short months! And therein, ladies and gentlemen, lies the rub. Recall that Bernanke said something substantively as follows: "When our policy response lowers interest rates on govt bonds, it induces market participants to take more risk. Someone selling their govt bond to us may go out and buy a corp bond, thereby lowering spreads. A bank selling their govt bond to us may go out and make a loan..." There is one problem with this logic: it is dead wrong. Because instead of forcing investors to rush out of the bond market, which potentially has much more upside embedded (the 30 Year is yielding 2.7% right now: this means the actual price of the 30 Year can continue going up and up and up), investors, even those "sophisticated" ones at banks, hedge funds, and prop desks who can trade CDS, IR Swaps, variance swaps, swaptions, and things the retail investor has never heard of, are doing something else, and something much simpler, entirely. They are simply front-running the Fed! The Fed's entire policy of boosting the economy is a failure for many reasons, but the primary purpose embedded therein - to lift stock markets, will forever be subordinated (to use the parlance of our times) to just frontrunning the Fed, which simply means buy whatever the Fed is buy, and sell whatever (if anything) it is selling. In simpler format: Frontrun what the Fed has publicly telegraphed to be doing ... Profit And as long as the Fed continues on the course of LSAP, either unsterilized or sterilized ala Twist, this will continue, and the Fed will continue failing upward. Sadly, this also means that at the end the Fed has only one option: to go Japanese and start buying not only REITs and ETFs, but ultimately individual stocks. At that point the best purchase, however will not be the stock market, but wheelbarrows.
106 次阅读|0 个评论
GMT+8, 2025-12-25 05:25