请选择 进入手机版 | 继续访问电脑版

tag 标签: Started经管大学堂:名校名师名课

相关帖子

版块 作者 回复/查看 最后发表
[下载]Getting Started in Value Investing attachment 金融学(理论版) caterash 2009-6-11 2 2717 IsabelleJDLaw 2022-6-30 10:32:41
悬赏 如何用SAS做回归对下数据以下数据 - [悬赏 30 个论坛币] SAS专版 zcyijia 2013-2-13 1 1849 wsq2015 2017-2-11 21:30:11
[下载]Get started in real estate investment trusts attachment 金融学(理论版) baihj 2008-12-19 2 2081 h2h2 2016-7-30 14:17:27
Getting Started with Stata for Windows Release 10 attachment 计量经济学与统计软件 bookbug 2008-6-20 34 11283 wc202 2013-11-12 10:05:42
option depname() incorrectly specified? 统计软件培训班VIP答疑区 alerry 2013-4-29 1 6048 arlionn 2013-4-29 22:24:32
Getting Started with Stata attachment 计量经济学与统计软件 pauling283 2009-6-16 0 1839 ihatestatistics 2013-4-14 00:04:27
SAS.Getting.Started.With.SAS.9.1.Text.Miner.pdf SAS专版 qwun 2009-2-18 3 2058 tyaer 2013-4-10 09:52:12
[推荐]Getting Started with SAS Power and Sample Size Application attachment 数据分析与数据科学 yongyitian 2008-12-19 4 3773 若水烟寒 2012-11-24 21:22:08
分享 [Getting_started_in_options] attachment 金融学(理论版) jinghua123 2009-6-17 4 1608 mackvid012 2012-3-28 17:30:59
Getting Started in Six Sigma by Michael C. Thomsett. Published by John Wiley &a attachment 商学院 cfalevel12007 2007-3-17 3 1864 moremoresummer 2012-3-4 11:35:59
Getting Started in Currency Trading attachment 金融学(理论版) 匿名 2007-12-29 0 2365 匿名网友 2012-1-6 04:59:55
Getting Started in Value Investing(07年11月新书) attachment 金融学(理论版) 五点天就黑 2007-12-10 0 2373 五点天就黑 2012-1-3 16:19:12
[分享]SAS.Publishing.Getting.Started.with.SAS.AF.and.Frames.Jun.2006 attachment 数据分析与数据科学 swp105 2007-5-7 3 2864 davil2000 2011-11-24 11:00:27
CFA Fundamental : The Schweser Study Guide to Getting Started 2006 attachment CFA、CVA、FRM等金融考证论坛 cfalevel12006 2007-2-3 2 2237 hayanhanel 2011-11-9 06:05:28
[下载]SAS.Enterprise.Miner经典下载《SAS.Institute.Getting.Started.with.SAS.Enterprise.M attachment 数据分析与数据科学 scorwill 2006-11-30 18 8081 HRI 2011-10-31 17:10:10
[下载]计量强势软件 RATS Getting Started attachment 计量经济学与统计软件 stanleyjunjun 2008-10-18 8 5734 freefishjane 2011-10-10 23:37:34
[下载]金融学英文原版教材Getting Started On Stock Market attachment 金融学(理论版) jcby 2009-1-30 0 2279 jcby 2009-1-30 19:57:00
Wiley(2007) Currency Trading For Dummies®, Getting Started Edition - Wil attachment 金融学(理论版) wankao 2008-5-3 2 1842 wesker1999 2008-5-3 10:08:00
All About Futures: The Easy Way to Get Started attachment 金融学(理论版) mimi_007705 2008-4-1 0 2163 mimi_007705 2008-4-1 00:49:00
All About Stocks: The Easy Way to Get Started attachment 金融学(理论版) mimi_007705 2008-4-1 0 1924 mimi_007705 2008-4-1 00:28:00

相关日志

分享 Why Bankers Don't Like Reggie: How Many "One Time" Items Do We Need To
insight 2013-11-8 09:56
Why Bankers Don't Like Reggie: How Many "One Time" Items Do We Need To Make An Item No Longer "One Time"? Featured font size decrease font size increase font size Print E-mail Comments (1) Tweet me! 20131009 162741 271 x Before I get started, I just want everyone to know that I always declared that There's Something Fishy at the House of Morgan (Wednesday, 27 April 2011) . Here are a few historical graphics to bring you up to speed to what should now be painfully obvious, re: JPM! I have warned of this event. JP Morgan (as well as Bank of America) is literally a litigation sinkhole. See JP Morgan Purposely Downplayed Litigation Risk That Spiked 5,000% Last Year Is Still Severely Under Reserved By Over $4 Billion!!! Shareholder Lawyers Should Be Scrambling Now Wednesday, March 2nd, 2011. Traditional banking revenues: manifest destiny as forwarned - Weakening Revenue Streams in US Banks Will Make Them More Susceptible To Contingent Risks Okay, now back to today's news... JP Morgan reported this morning and we got more of the same, simply that much harder to ignore. On Thursday, 06 January 2011 I posted " As JP Morgan Other Banks Legal Costs Spike, Many Should Ask If It Was Not Obvious Years Ago That This Industry May Become The "New" Tobacco Companies ". Today Bloomberg reported JPMorgan’s Dimon Posts First Loss on $7.2 Billion Legal Cost to mounting litigation and regulatory probes. No surprises here. We saw it coming two years ago and warned accordingly. As excerpted: The third-quarter loss was $380 million, or 17 cents a share, compared with a profit of $5.71 billion, or $1.40, a year earlier, the New York-based company said today in a statement. Shares of the company rose 2.6 percent at 7:50 a.m. after profit adjusted for one-time items beat analysts’ estimates. ... The pretax legal charge was $9.2 billion, compared with $684 million a year earlier. Litigation reserves at the end of September were $23 billion, the bank said, adding that “reasonably possible” losses in excess of those reserves were $5.7 billion. And the (now perennial) kicker... JPMorgan rose to $53.90 in New York trading from $52.52 at the close yesterday. Earnings adjusted for one-time items were $1.42 a share, exceeding the $1.30 average estimate of 20 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg. Pray thee tell me, how many times do "one time" items have to occur before they're no longer considered "one time" items???!!! JP Morgan "found" earnings in the form of reserve releases (again), from the press release: $1.60 billion pretax benefit; $992 million after-tax ($0.26 per share after-tax increase in earnings) from reduced reserves in Consumer Community Banking Now, we've seen this movie before haven't we? The following is an excerpte from a post I made TWO YEARS AGO!: As Earnings Season is Here, I Reiterate My Warning That Big Banks Will Pay for Optimism Driven Reduction of Reserves . Time will tell if I am correct, but the trends are still moving in my favor. From Bloomberg: JPMorgan Chase Co. and the biggest U.S. banks face billions of dollars in legal costs related to their role in the financial crisis, threatening their profits and the stock price gains they made in 2010, analysts said. JPMorgan, the second biggest bank by assets, reported $5.2 billion of legal costs in the first nine months of 2009, compared with a gain of $10 million in the same period a year earlier. The costs would rise if the bank reserves for multibillion-dollar lawsuits by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc . and the trustee liquidating Bernard L. Madoff’s firm. ... JPMorgan’s third-quarter net profit of $4.4 billion, up 23 percent from the year earlier, would have been larger if it hadn’t set aside $1.3 billion of pretax income for lawsuits and $1 billion for mortgage repurchases. Banks haven’t yet reported their results for the fourth quarter. Of course, there are a few tidbits missing from this statement that can add to its accuracy. Let's see... Where did those profits come from? Again, you will find divergence between how BoomBustBlog reports and that of mainstream financial reporting. See JP Morgan’s 3rd Quarter Earnigns Analysis and a Chronological Reminder of Just How Wrong Brand Name Banks, Analysts, CEOs Pundits Can Be When They Say XYZ Bank Can Never Go Out of Business!!! Sunday, October 17th, 2010 In a Nutshell, JPM’s quarterly results were downright horrible – as we expected and warned of in our previous quarterly analyses (see notes at bottom of page)… JP Morgan’s Q3 net revenue declined 11% y/y (-5% q/q) to $24.8bn as investment banking revenue declined 18% y/y (-9% q/q) to $12.6bn from $13.9bn in the previous year and net interest income declined 2% y/y (-2% q/q, off of a combination of ZIRP victimization and a rapidly shrinking asset base and loan book) to $12.5bn versus $12.7bn in the previous year. Non-interest expense increased 7% y/y (-2% q/q) to $14.4bn as compensation expenses to net revenues remained broadly flat (28% vs 27.5%) while non-compensation expenses to net revenues jumped to 33% vs 23% in the corresponding period last year. As a result of “Fraudclosure” we expect this number to skyrocket next quarter. Overall, the efficiency ratio (total expenses-to-net revenues) increased to 60% vs 51% and we expect this ratio to spike next quarter as well as the banking business becomes even more expensive. Click to enlarge… However, despite a decline in net revenue and increase in non-interest expenses (both of which appear to be part of an obvious trend), profit before taxes was up 22% y/y as provisions for credit losses were slashed by 60%. JPM decreased its provision for credit losses despite no evidence of a substantial, sustainable improvement in credit metrics (please reference As Earnings Season is Here, I Reiterate My Warning That Big Banks Will Pay for Optimism Driven Reduction of Reserves ). Provisions have lagged charge-offs for two consecutive quarters in a row. As a result, banks allowances for loan losses have decreased to 4.9% in Q3 from 5.1% in Q2 and 4.7% in previous year. Although under provisioning has helped the bank to mask its dearth in profits it has also materially undermined its ability to absorb losses if economic conditions worsen. The Eyles test, a measure of banks ability to absorb losses, has consequently worsened to 1.9% in Q3 from 3.7% in Q2 and 5.9% in Q3 09. Wait a minute! If Reggie Middleton complained about reserve pulling and legal expenses 1,2 and 3 years ago and was proven right, how are the occurence of these items in 2013 to be considered "One Time" items???? Exactly! ZeroHedge puts it succinctly: In short: of the firm's $1.42 in pro forma EPS, a whopping $1.59 was purely from the addback of these two items.
个人分类: banking|11 次阅读|0 个评论
分享 很會抓timing 的攝影師
kendoyugi 2012-11-28 13:29
“I started from this damn recession and what it meant to so many people who lost their job. There are many extremely talented dancers kicked out or chefs left without a job, those who pass by us on the street and whose incredible ability to dance or to prepare exceptional dishes remain the same, at any time. Dance always accompanies a dancer, whether he is paid for what he does, or not” said Jordan Matter.
13 次阅读|0 个评论

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-3-29 00:29