发帖
雷达卡
摘要翻译：
有人认为手机是安全的，因为单个微波光子没有足够的能量来打破化学键。我们表明手机技术在经典波极限下工作，而不是单光子极限。基于相对于热能的能量密度，我们估计了可能预期效果的阈值。这些似乎与许多实验观察相吻合。根据B.Leikind发表的评论修改了附录。
---
英文标题：
《What does photon energy tell us about cellphone safety?》
---
作者：
William J. Bruno
---
最新提交年份：
2017
---
分类信息：
一级分类：Quantitative Biology 数量生物学
二级分类：Other Quantitative Biology 其他定量生物学
分类描述：Work in quantitative biology that does not fit into the other q-bio classifications
不适合其他q-bio分类的定量生物学工作
--
一级分类：Physics 物理学
二级分类：Biological Physics 生物物理学
分类描述：Molecular biophysics, cellular biophysics, neurological biophysics, membrane biophysics, single-molecule biophysics, ecological biophysics, quantum phenomena in biological systems (quantum biophysics), theoretical biophysics, molecular dynamics/modeling and simulation, game theory, biomechanics, bioinformatics, microorganisms, virology, evolution, biophysical methods.
分子生物物理、细胞生物物理、神经生物物理、膜生物物理、单分子生物物理、生态生物物理、生物系统中的量子现象（量子生物物理）、理论生物物理、分子动力学/建模与模拟、博弈论、生物力学、生物信息学、微生物、病毒学、进化论、生物物理方法。
--
---
英文摘要：
It has been argued that cellphones are safe because a single microwave photon does not have enough energy to break a chemical bond. We show that cellphone technology operates in the classical wave limit, not the single photon limit. Based on energy densities relative to thermal energy, we estimate thresholds at which effects might be expected. These seem to correspond somewhat with many experimental observations. Revised with appendix responding to critique published by B. Leikind.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1104.5008
京公网安备 11010802022788号
