摘要翻译:
混合逻辑扩展了模态逻辑,支持由所谓的标称值指定的单个状态的推理。我们在广义的余代数语义学中研究混合逻辑,其中Kripke框架被给定函子的余代数所取代,从而涵盖了广泛的推理原则,例如,包括概率算子、分次算子、缺省算子或联合算子。具体地说,我们为给定的共代数混合逻辑建立了允许命名规范模型的一般准则,并给出了纯扩展的完备性证明,同时也给出了具有局部绑定的扩展混合语言的完备性证明。我们用一些例子来实例化我们的框架。值得注意的是,我们证明了具有局部绑定的分次混合逻辑的完备性。
---
英文标题:
《Named Models in Coalgebraic Hybrid Logic》
---
作者:
Lutz Schroeder and Dirk Pattinson
---
最新提交年份:
2010
---
分类信息:
一级分类:Computer Science 计算机科学
二级分类:Logic in Computer Science 计算机科学中的逻辑
分类描述:Covers all aspects of logic in computer science, including finite model theory, logics of programs, modal logic, and program verification. Programming language semantics should have Programming Languages as the primary subject area. Roughly includes material in ACM Subject Classes D.2.4, F.3.1, F.4.0, F.4.1, and F.4.2; some material in F.4.3 (formal languages) may also be appropriate here, although Computational Complexity is typically the more appropriate subject area.
涵盖计算机科学中逻辑的所有方面,包括有限模型理论,程序逻辑,模态逻辑和程序验证。程序设计语言语义学应该把程序设计语言作为主要的学科领域。大致包括ACM学科类D.2.4、F.3.1、F.4.0、F.4.1和F.4.2中的材料;F.4.3(形式语言)中的一些材料在这里也可能是合适的,尽管计算复杂性通常是更合适的主题领域。
--
一级分类:Computer Science 计算机科学
二级分类:Artificial Intelligence 人工智能
分类描述:Covers all areas of AI except Vision, Robotics, Machine Learning, Multiagent Systems, and Computation and Language (Natural Language Processing), which have separate subject areas. In particular, includes Expert Systems, Theorem Proving (although this may overlap with Logic in Computer Science), Knowledge Representation, Planning, and Uncertainty in AI. Roughly includes material in ACM Subject Classes I.2.0, I.2.1, I.2.3, I.2.4, I.2.8, and I.2.11.
涵盖了人工智能的所有领域,除了视觉、机器人、机器学习、多智能体系统以及计算和语言(自然语言处理),这些领域有独立的学科领域。特别地,包括专家系统,定理证明(尽管这可能与计算机科学中的逻辑重叠),知识表示,规划,和人工智能中的不确定性。大致包括ACM学科类I.2.0、I.2.1、I.2.3、I.2.4、I.2.8和I.2.11中的材料。
--
---
英文摘要:
Hybrid logic extends modal logic with support for reasoning about individual states, designated by so-called nominals. We study hybrid logic in the broad context of coalgebraic semantics, where Kripke frames are replaced with coalgebras for a given functor, thus covering a wide range of reasoning principles including, e.g., probabilistic, graded, default, or coalitional operators. Specifically, we establish generic criteria for a given coalgebraic hybrid logic to admit named canonical models, with ensuing completeness proofs for pure extensions on the one hand, and for an extended hybrid language with local binding on the other. We instantiate our framework with a number of examples. Notably, we prove completeness of graded hybrid logic with local binding.
---
PDF链接:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.0735