楼主: 大多数88
411 0

[电气工程与系统科学] EEGs两个常见参考点的分析 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 3粉丝

会员

学术权威

68%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
10
论坛币
10 个
通用积分
64.1703
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
4 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
23514 点
帖子
3880
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2022-2-24
最后登录
2022-4-15

楼主
大多数88 在职认证  发表于 2022-3-5 22:27:25 来自手机 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群|倒序 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
摘要翻译:
临床脑电图(EEG)数据根据许多操作条件(例如,电极的类型和位置,所使用的电气接地类型)而有很大差异。本研究探讨了两种不同参考蒙太奇的统计差异:联系耳(LE)和平均参考(AR)。其中每一个都占了TUH脑电语料库中大约45%的数据。在这项研究中,我们探讨了这种可变性对机器学习性能的影响。我们比较了使用这两种蒙太奇生成的特征的统计特性,并探讨了性能对基于标准隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)的分类系统的影响。我们发现,在LE数据上训练的系统的性能显著优于仅在AR数据上训练的系统(77.2%对61.4%)。我们还证明了在两个数据集上训练的系统的性能都有所损害(71.4%对77.2%)。对数据的统计分析表明,应考虑均值、方差和通道归一化。然而,倒相均值减法并没有带来性能上的改善,这表明这些统计差异的影响更微妙。
---
英文标题:
《An Analysis of Two Common Reference Points for EEGs》
---
作者:
Silvia Lopez, Aaron Gross, Scott Yang, Meysam Golmohammadi, Iyad Obeid
  and Joseph Picone
---
最新提交年份:
2018
---
分类信息:

一级分类:Electrical Engineering and Systems Science        电气工程与系统科学
二级分类:Signal Processing        信号处理
分类描述:Theory, algorithms, performance analysis and applications of signal and data analysis, including physical modeling, processing, detection and parameter estimation, learning, mining, retrieval, and information extraction. The term "signal" includes speech, audio, sonar, radar, geophysical, physiological, (bio-) medical, image, video, and multimodal natural and man-made signals, including communication signals and data. Topics of interest include: statistical signal processing, spectral estimation and system identification; filter design, adaptive filtering / stochastic learning; (compressive) sampling, sensing, and transform-domain methods including fast algorithms; signal processing for machine learning and machine learning for signal processing applications; in-network and graph signal processing; convex and nonconvex optimization methods for signal processing applications; radar, sonar, and sensor array beamforming and direction finding; communications signal processing; low power, multi-core and system-on-chip signal processing; sensing, communication, analysis and optimization for cyber-physical systems such as power grids and the Internet of Things.
信号和数据分析的理论、算法、性能分析和应用,包括物理建模、处理、检测和参数估计、学习、挖掘、检索和信息提取。“信号”一词包括语音、音频、声纳、雷达、地球物理、生理、(生物)医学、图像、视频和多模态自然和人为信号,包括通信信号和数据。感兴趣的主题包括:统计信号处理、谱估计和系统辨识;滤波器设计;自适应滤波/随机学习;(压缩)采样、传感和变换域方法,包括快速算法;用于机器学习的信号处理和用于信号处理应用的机器学习;网络与图形信号处理;信号处理中的凸和非凸优化方法;雷达、声纳和传感器阵列波束形成和测向;通信信号处理;低功耗、多核、片上系统信号处理;信息物理系统的传感、通信、分析和优化,如电网和物联网。
--
一级分类:Computer Science        计算机科学
二级分类:Machine Learning        机器学习
分类描述:Papers on all aspects of machine learning research (supervised, unsupervised, reinforcement learning, bandit problems, and so on) including also robustness, explanation, fairness, and methodology. cs.LG is also an appropriate primary category for applications of machine learning methods.
关于机器学习研究的所有方面的论文(有监督的,无监督的,强化学习,强盗问题,等等),包括健壮性,解释性,公平性和方法论。对于机器学习方法的应用,CS.LG也是一个合适的主要类别。
--
一级分类:Statistics        统计学
二级分类:Machine Learning        机器学习
分类描述:Covers machine learning papers (supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised learning, graphical models, reinforcement learning, bandits, high dimensional inference, etc.) with a statistical or theoretical grounding
覆盖机器学习论文(监督,无监督,半监督学习,图形模型,强化学习,强盗,高维推理等)与统计或理论基础
--

---
英文摘要:
  Clinical electroencephalographic (EEG) data varies significantly depending on a number of operational conditions (e.g., the type and placement of electrodes, the type of electrical grounding used). This investigation explores the statistical differences present in two different referential montages: Linked Ear (LE) and Averaged Reference (AR). Each of these accounts for approximately 45% of the data in the TUH EEG Corpus. In this study, we explore the impact this variability has on machine learning performance. We compare the statistical properties of features generated using these two montages, and explore the impact of performance on our standard Hidden Markov Model (HMM) based classification system. We show that a system trained on LE data significantly outperforms one trained only on AR data (77.2% vs. 61.4%). We also demonstrate that performance of a system trained on both data sets is somewhat compromised (71.4% vs. 77.2%). A statistical analysis of the data suggests that mean, variance and channel normalization should be considered. However, cepstral mean subtraction failed to produce an improvement in performance, suggesting that the impact of these statistical differences is subtler.
---
PDF链接:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.02474
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Applications Optimization Statistical performance Application 例如 system 考虑

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-10-6 18:48