楼主: wallace_w
3690 23

[财经英语角区] 20110618 Follow Me 39 Wallace_w [推广有奖]

21
sunxiaomingkk 发表于 2011-6-19 08:45:13
早上起来,占个座!
不鸣则已,一鸣冲天!

22
chuan861016 发表于 2011-6-19 09:53:13
{:2_31:}昨天考试,今天补起来

23
whachel1976 发表于 2011-6-19 11:25:56
39,39

leeway  ['li:wei]  
n.余地
unfancied  
adj. 不可能赢的
overstretched
过度扩张

The falling down of sales volume mainly comes from the government's limitation on the quantity of what residents can own. It may be regarded as a soft landing of the real estate market. Even though the market exists a bubble, I don't think it is big enough to burst with a pop. If the price slumps, the limitation policy is expected to be cancelled.
As for the price index, I think there are some exaggerations in it. I remember that once I  came to a housing bureau and found the house price shown on the board was lower than the real amount buyers paid. I guess some amount  is extracted from the data, such as tax or something like that. And the tax is an automatic stabilizer. With less money to afford to buy the house, less tax is to be paid. Thus, the basic data gathered by the bureau will fall slower than what we feel. For the network focusing on property, it surely knows the importance of keeping house transactions active,  and unwillingly to show a stagnating situation. If the data can be shown in a bright side, it is almost all the case, which is quite different with the motives in a surging market. Therefore, what presented before us is a not so fluctuating index.

24
超级健忘 发表于 2011-6-19 21:41:57
inevitable 不可避免的,必然发生的;
clampdown 制裁, 严禁, 取缔;
dwindle 缩小,减少;
leeway 余地
Statistics provided by government is not credible. The National Bureau of Statistics has a responsbility to adjust statistical method to practical situation and provide credible statistics.
80 字节以内
不支持自定义 Discuz! 代码

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-10 22:58