楼主: vagabond
2308 2

[产业组织理论] 中国的反托拉斯法:国外的研究 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 1粉丝

已卖:2205份资源

院士

3%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
5
论坛币
4359331 个
通用积分
7131.9849
学术水平
30 点
热心指数
27 点
信用等级
23 点
经验
9696 点
帖子
2374
精华
0
在线时间
12 小时
注册时间
2005-2-1
最后登录
2018-10-6

楼主
vagabond 发表于 2005-2-20 19:03:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
<P>Antitrust in China: The Problem of Incentive Compatibility</P>
<P><b>Abstract: </b>     
<FONT face="ARIAL, HELVETICA">This paper reviews China's recent efforts to enact a competition policy (antitrust) law. We focus on three issues: (1) What is the substance of the proposed law, and how does it differ from existing antitrust law in other countries, (2) How will the law be implemented or enforced, and how will those who must implement this law interpret their mandate, and (3) What will be the likely effects of this law given China's unique history and cultural heritage. We emphasize China's economic, legal and regulatory contexts in which an antitrust law may be enforced. Our central focus is the problem of establishing a substantive and procedural legal framework that is incentive-compatible with economic efficiency and growth.

The policy debate on antitrust within the Chinese government is not public. An unofficial draft of the proposed law was widely circulated outside China in 2003 and was the subject of a public commentary by the American Bar Association. A slightly revised draft was submitted for deliberation to the State Council in March 2004. The changes from the prior draft seem to have chiefly to do with which agency of the government will administer the law. At this time, no further information is available to us. Our comments on the "proposed law" are therefore based on the version that has already circulated.

We find a number of respects in which the draft law could be improved, both to increase its clarity and to make its enforcement more consistent with the goal of achieving improvements in economic efficiency. We also find much merit in the draft, especially its strong focus on reducing anticompetitive practices of state owned enterprises (SOEs) and other government bodies. However, our major difficulty with the new law is that, in the absence of a tradition of reliance on the rule of law, Chinese and foreign enterprises will find it very difficult to rely on the antitrust statute or the actions of the courts in China as a basis for predicting the antitrust liability that might result from various business practices. Therefore, the principal vector by which antitrust law (or indeed any law) affects economic behavior is absent from the Chinese scene. Unless the bureaucracy that enforces the new antitrust law actively pursues a policy of consistent enforcement based on written guidelines, stare decisis, or other sources of predictability, the substance of the statute itself will have little significance. That outcome would represent a significant loss for the economic welfare of the Chinese people. </P>
<P></FONT></P>
<P> 9021.rar (205.76 KB, 需要: 1 个论坛币) 本附件包括:
  • ssrn-id595801.pdf

</P>
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:反托拉斯法 反托拉斯 托拉斯 Improvements establishing 研究 国外 反托拉斯法

4:12 I know both how to be abased, and I know how to abound: every where and in all things I am instructed both to be full and to be hungry, both to abound and to suffer need. [Philippians]

沙发
baiming(真实交易用户) 发表于 2005-2-23 10:00:00
斯坦福大学法学院的的一篇working pepper.

藤椅
MRFROG(未真实交易用户) 发表于 2005-2-26 13:29:00
不错,谢谢!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-5 09:29