楼主: vagabond
2609 2

[下载]英语论文:竞争降低成本吗? [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 1粉丝

院士

5%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
5
论坛币
4359319 个
通用积分
7131.4711
学术水平
20 点
热心指数
17 点
信用等级
13 点
经验
9852 点
帖子
2426
精华
0
在线时间
12 小时
注册时间
2005-2-1
最后登录
2018-10-6

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
<P>看不懂摘要的别买哟</P>
<P>Does Competition Reduce Costs? Assessing the Impact of Regulatory Restructuring on U.S. Electric Generation Efficiency </P>
<P><b>Abstract: </b>     
<FONT face="ARIAL, HELVETICA">Although the allocative efficiency benefits of competition are a tenet of microeconomic theory, the relation between competition and technical efficiency is less well understood. Neoclassical models of profit-maximization subsume static cost-minimizing behavior regardless of market competitiveness, but agency models of managerial behavior suggest possible scope for competition to influence cost-reducing effort choices. This paper explores the empirical effects of competition on technical efficiency in the context of electricity industry restructuring. Restructuring programs adopted by many U.S. states made utilities residual claimants to cost savings and increased their exposure to competitive markets. We estimate the impact of these changes on annual generating plant-level input demand for non-fuel operating expenses, the number of employees and fuel use. We find that municipally-owned plants, whose owners were for the most part unaffected by restructuring, experienced the smallest efficiency gains over the past decade. Investor-owned utility plants in states that restructured their wholesale electricity markets had the largest reductions in nonfuel operating expenses and employment, while investor-owned plants in nonrestructuring states fell between these extremes. The analysis also highlights the substantive importance of treating the simultaneity of input and output decisions, which we do through an instrumental variables approach. </P>
<P></FONT></P>
<P> 9182.rar (487.57 KB, 需要: 5 个论坛币) 本附件包括:
  • ssrn-id618281.pdf
</P>
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:英语论文 Neoclassical Simultaneity instrumental maximization efficiency understood technical benefits relation

沙发
baiming 发表于 2005-2-24 11:17:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
您应发在博弈论与产业组织版块嘛。

使用道具

藤椅
vagabond 发表于 2005-4-1 23:44:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
4:12 I know both how to be abased, and I know how to abound: every where and in all things I am instructed both to be full and to be hungry, both to abound and to suffer need. [Philippians]

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-2 22:56