楼主: hanszhu
15245 41

[学科前沿] [讨论]Structural Equation Modeling [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 34粉丝

院士

26%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

Clojure NewOccidental

Job and Interview

Perl资源总汇

威望
7
论坛币
144575021 个
通用积分
71.8575
学术水平
37 点
热心指数
38 点
信用等级
25 点
经验
23228 点
帖子
1869
精华
1
在线时间
796 小时
注册时间
2005-1-3
最后登录
2024-4-22

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
<H1>What is Structural Equation Modeling?</H1>
<P><IMG src="http://www2.gsu.edu/~mkteer/fitfunc.gif" align=bottom>
<P>Structural equation modeling, or SEM, is a very general, chiefly linear, chiefly cross-sectional statistical modeling technique. Factor analysis, path analysis and regression all represent special cases of SEM.
<P>SEM is a largely confirmatory, rather than exploratory, technique. That is, a researcher are more likely to use SEM to determine whether a certain model is valid., rather than using SEM to "find" a suitable model--although SEM analyses often involve a certain exploratory element.
<P>In SEM, interest usually focuses on <a href="http://www.gsu.edu/~mkteer/sem2.html#latentvar" target="_blank" >latent constructs</A>--abstract psychological variables like "intelligence" or "attitude toward the brand"--rather than on the manifest variables used to measure these constructs. Measurement is recognized as difficult and error-prone. By explicitly modeling measurement error, SEM users seek to derive unbiased estimates for the relations between latent constructs. To this end, SEM allows multiple measures to be associated with a single latent construct.
<P>A structural equation model implies a structure of the covariance matrix of the measures (hence an alternative name for this field, "analysis of covariance structures"). Once the model's parameters have been estimated, the resulting model-implied covariance matrix can then be compared to an empirical or data-based covariance matrix. If the two matrices are consistent with one another, then the structural equation model can be considered a plausible explanation for relations between the measures.
<P>Compared to regression and factor analysis, SEM is a relatively young field, having its roots in papers that appeared only in the late 1960s. As such, the methodology is still developing, and even fundamental concepts are subject to challenge and revision. This rapid change is a source of excitement for some researchers and a source of frustration for others.</P>
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Structural equation Modeling struct model determine represent equation general special

沙发
hanszhu 发表于 2005-3-5 02:54:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

The Form of Structural Equation Models

Structural equation modeling incorporates several different approaches or frameworks to representing these models. In one well-known framework (popularized by Karl Jöreskog, University of Uppsala), the general structural equation model can be represented by three matrix equations:

However, in applied work, structural equation models are most often represented graphically. Here is a graphical example of a structural equation model:

For more information, click on an element of this diagram, or choose from this list: Latent Constructs | Structural Model | Structural Error | Manifest Variables | Measurement Model | Measurement Error |

This diagram uses the dominant symbolic language in the SEM world. However, there are alternate forms, including the " RAM," reticular action model.


Latent Constructs

In structural equation modeling, the key variables of interest are usually "latent constructs"--abstract psychological concepts such as "intelligence" or "attitude." We can observe the behavior of latent variables only indirectly, and imperfectly, through their effects on manifest variables.

A structural equation model may include two types of latent constructs--exogenous and endogenous. In the most traditional system, exogenous constructs are indicated by the Greek character "ksi" (at left)

and endogenous constructs are indicated by the Greek character "eta" (at right). These two types of constructs are distinguished on the basis of whether or not they are dependent variables in any equation in the system of equations represented by the model. Exogenous constructs are independent variables in all equations in which they appear, while endogenous constructs are dependent variables in at least one equation--although they may be independent variables in other equations in the system. In graphical terms, each endogenous construct is the target of at least one one-headed arrow, while exogenous constructs are only targeted by two-headed arrows.

Structural Model

In SEM, the structural model includes the relationships among the latent constructs. These relationships are chiefly linear, although flexible extensions to the basic SEM system allow for the inclusion of nonlinear relations, as well. In the diagram, one-headed arrows represent regression relationships, while two-headed arrows represent correlational relations--that is, shared variation that is not explained within the model.

Parameters representing regression relations between latent constructs are typically labeled with the Greek character "gamma" (at left) for the regression of an endogenous construct on an exogenous construct, or with the Greek character "beta" (at right) for the regression of one endogenous construct on another endogenous construct.

Typically in SEM, exogenous constructs are allowed to covary freely. Parameters labeled with the Greek character "phi" (at left) represent these covariances. This covariance comes from common predictors of the exogenous constructs which lie outside the model under consideration.

Structural Error

Few SEM researchers expect to perfectly predict their dependent constructs, so model typically include a structural error term, labeled with the Greek character "zeta" (at right). To achieve consistent parameter estimation, these error terms are assumed to be uncorrelated with the model's exogenous constructs. (Violations of this assumption come about as a result of the excluded predictor problem.) However, structural error terms may be modeled as being correlated with other structural error terms. Such a specification indicates that the endogenous constructs associated with those error terms share common variation that is not explained by predictor relations in the model.

Manifest Variables

SEM researchers use manifest variables--that is, actual measures and scores--to ground their latent construct models with real data. Manifest variables associated with exogenous constructs are labeled X, while those associated with endogenous constructs are labeled Y. Otherwise, there is no fundamental distinction between these measures, and a measure that is labeled X in one model may be labeled Y in another.

Measurement Model

In SEM, each latent construct is usually associated with multiple measures. SEM researchers most commonly link the latent constructs to their measures through a factor analytic measurement model. That is, each latent construct is modeled as a common factor underlying the associated measures. These "loadings" linking constructs to measures are labeled with the Greek character "lambda" (at left). Structural equation models can include two separate "lambda matrices, one on the X side and one on the Y side. In SEM applications, the most common measurement model is the congeneric measurement model, where each measure is associated with only one latent construct, and all covariation between measures is a consequence of the relations between measures and constructs.

(Sometimes, however, it makes more sense to model a latent construct as the result or consequence of its measures. This is the causal indicators model. This alternative measurement model is also central to Partial Least Squares, a methodology related to SEM.)

Measurement Error

SEM users typically recognize that their measures are imperfect, and they attempt to model this imperfection. Thus, structural equation models include terms representing measurement error. In the context of the factor analytic measurement model, these measurement error terms are uniquenesses or unique factors associated with each measure. Measurement error terms associated with X measures are labeled with the Greek character "delta" (at left) while terms associated with Y measures are labeled with "epsilon" (at right). Conceptually, almost every measure has an associated error term. In other words, almost every measure is acknowledged to include some error.

However, when a construct is associated with only a single measure, it is usually impossible (due to the limits of identification) to estimate the amount of measurement error within the model. In such cases, the researcher must prespecify the amount of measurement error before attempting to estimate model parameters. In this situation, researchers may be tempted to simply assume that there is no measurement error. However, if this assumption is false, then model parameter estimates will be biased.

使用道具

藤椅
hanszhu 发表于 2005-3-5 02:54:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

使用道具

板凳
hanszhu 发表于 2005-3-5 02:56:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

Lecture Notes: Structural Equation Modeling

http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/structur.htm

使用道具

报纸
hanszhu 发表于 2005-3-5 02:58:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

Lecture Notes: Structural equation model

http://seamonkey.ed.asu.edu/~alex/teaching/WBI/SEM.html

使用道具

地板
hanszhu 发表于 2005-3-5 03:05:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
Measuring Class Compromise: A Structural Equation Model of 15 Advanced Capitalist Democracies

ABSTRACT:

Using a structural equation model, this article demonstrates a novel approach to studying the distribution of class-based political power in advanced capitalist democracies. Situated within a theoretical discussion of pluralism and class dominant theories of political power, the article begins with a critique of the literature’s existing measurements of political democracy. After showing the limitations of these indices, particularly their inability to measure the distribution of class-based political power over time, the article then presents an alternative measurement of democratic governance, one that is consistent with the general thrust of class dominant perspectives in sociology. The results of a structural equations model shows that, within the advanced capitalist democracies, class compromise manifests in a country’s prevailing rates of union density, voter participation, incarceration, and income inequality. Finally, applying this model to individual countries, the article ends by creating an index of class compromise for 15 advanced capitalist democracies from 1980 to 1999.

9583.rar (316.68 KB) 本附件包括:
  • viewcontent.pdf

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-5 3:06:43编辑过]

使用道具

7
hanszhu 发表于 2005-3-5 03:05:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
[求助]Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques

Edited by George A. Marcoulides California State University, Fullerton Randall E. Schumaker University of North Texas

Structural equation models are used by biologists, educational and medical researchers, psychologists, social scientists, and others who traditionally deal with nonexperimental and quasi-experimental data. Perhaps the most important and influential statistical revolution to have recently occurred in the scientific arena, the development of structural equation models has provided researchers with a comprehensive method for the quantification and testing of theories.

Accepted today as a major component of applied multivariate analysis, structural equation modeling includes latent variables, measurement errors in both dependent and independent variables, multiple indicators, reciprocal causation, simultaneity, and interdependence. As implemented in most commercial computer packages—Amos, EQS, LISREL, LISCOMP, Mx, SAS PROC-CALIS, STATISTICA-SEPATH—the method includes as special cases such procedures as confirmatory factor analysis, multiple regression, path analysis, models for time-dependent data, recursive and non-recursive models for cross-sectional and longitudinal data, and covariance structure analysis.

This volume introduces the latest issues and developments in structural equation modeling techniques. By focusing primarily on the application of structural equation modeling techniques in example cases and situations, it provides an understanding and working knowledge of advanced structural equation modeling techniques with a minimum of mathematical derivations. This didactic approach allows readers to better understand the underlying logic of advanced structural equation modeling techniques and thereby to effectively assess the suitability of the method for their own research. The volume was written for a broad audience crossing many disciplines, and makes the assumption that readers have mastered the equivalent of graduate level multivariate statistics courses that include coverage of introductory structural equation modeling techniques.

Audience

Researchers and practitioners throughout education and the social sciences; a supplemental text for courses in SEM modeling and multivariate statistics.

Contents

  • Introduction, by G. A. Marcoulides and R. E. Schumacker
  • Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix Analysis, by W. Wothke
  • Nonlinear Structural Equation Models: The Kenny-Judd Model With Interaction Effects, by K. G. Joreskog and F. Yang
  • Multilevel Models From a Multiple Group Structural Equation Perspective, by J. J. McArdle and F. Hamagami
  • Cross-Domain Analyses of Change Over Time: Combining Growth Modeling and Covariance Structure Analysis, by J. B. Willett and A. G. Sayer
  • A Hierarchy of Univariate and Multivariate Structural Times Series Models, by S. L. Hershberger, P. C. M. Molenaar, and S. E. Corneal
  • Bootstrapping Techniques in the Analysis of Mean and Covariance Structures, by Y-F. Yung and P. M. Bentler
  • A Limited-Information Estimator for LISREL Models With or Without Heteroscedastic Errors, by K. A. Bollen
  • Full Information Estimation in the Presence of Incomplete Data, by J. L. Arbuckle
  • Inference Problems With Equivalent Models, by L. J. Williams, H. Bozdogan, and L. Aiman-Smith
  • An Evaluation of Incremental Fit Indices: A Clarification of Mathematical and Empirical Properties, by H. W. Marsh, J. R. Balla, and K-T. Hau

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-5 4:57:15编辑过]

使用道具

8
hanszhu 发表于 2005-3-5 03:09:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

[求助]Ebook: Testing Structural Equation Models

Testing Structural Equation Models

Edited by Kenneth A. Bollen University of North Carolina J. Scott Long Indiana University

"This book is a valuable adjunct to the extant literature on specification, estimation, and identification. My overall impression is that this volume is indispensable for those wishing to keep current with this fast-moving field. I recommend that this book be used as a supplementary text in a graduate-level course in structural equation modeling. This book . . . provides students with the necessary literature for a broad understanding of structural equation modeling."

— Structural Equation Modeling

"This book is worth its weight in gold! Drawing on the expertise of key researchers in the field, Bollen and Long provide readers with a comprehensive review of the critical issues, as well as innovative approaches that address these issues in the fitting, estimating, and testing of structural equation models. The book is an absolute 'must' for all researchers interested in conducting sound structural equation modeling applications."

— Barbara M. Byrne, Department of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ontario

"This collection of papers, so nicely written for and edited by Professors Bollen and Long, presents the 'state of the art' in significance testing and goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. The coverage of topics is almost as impressive as the set of authors--nearly all the methodological leaders in this important and quite active research area have helped make this volume an immediate classic. It should be used as a text in graduate-level courses on structural equation models to augment the standard textbooks. The editors are to be praised for lending their own expertise and for taking the time to put this excellent collection together."

— Stanley Wasserman, Departments of Psychology and Statistics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

What is the role of fit measures when respecifying a model? Should the means of the sampling distributions of a fit index be unrelated to the size of the sample? Is it better to estimate the statistical power of the chi-square test than to turn to fit indices? Aimed at exploring these and other related questions, this group of well-known scholars examines the methods of testing structural equation models (SEMS) with and without measurement error—as estimated by such programs as EQS, LISREL, and CALIS. Highly integrated and valuable, this book is a must for every researcher's shelf, particularly with coverage like: testing structural equation models, multifaceted conceptions of fit, Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices, specification tests for the linear regression model, bootstrapping goodness of fit measures, bayesian model selection, alternative ways of assessing model fit, power evaluations, goodness of fit with categorical and other non-normal variables, new covariance structure model improvement statistics, and nonpositive definite matrices.

Contents

  • 1. Testing Structural Equation Models K. A. Bollen, J. S. Long
  • 2. Multifaceted Conceptions of Fit in Structural Equation Models J. S. Tanaka
  • 3. Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models D. W. Gerbing, J. C. Anderson
  • 4. Some Specification Tests for the Linear Regression Model J. S. Long, P. K. Trivedi
  • 5. Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models K. A. Bollen, R. Stine
  • 6. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit M. W. Browne, R. Cudeck
  • 7. Bayesian Model Selection in Structural Equation Models A. E. Raftery
  • 8. Power Evaluations in Structural Equation Models W. E. Saris, A. Satorra
  • 9. Goodness of Fit with Categorical and Other Nonnormal Variables B. O. Muthén
  • 10. Some New Covariance Structure Model Improvement Statistics P. M. Bentler, C. P. Chou
  • 11. Nonpositive Definite Matrices in Structural Modeling W. Wothke
  • 12. Testing Structural Equation Models K. G. Jöreskog

使用道具

9
hanszhu 发表于 2005-3-5 03:12:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

A Preliminary Structural Equation Model of Comprehension and Persuasion of Interactive Advertising Brand Web Sites

Wendy Macias

Department of Advertising and Public Relations University of Georgia


Table of Contents

使用道具

10
hanszhu 发表于 2005-3-5 03:23:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-4-23 14:53