1. Armstrong, C. S., W. R. Guay, and J. P. Weber. 2010. The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2-3):179-234.
2. Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver, and W. R. Landsman. 2001. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1-3):77-104.
3. Beyer, A., D. A. Cohen, T. Z. Lys, and B. R. Walther. 2010. The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2-3):296-343.
4. Brickley, J. A., and J. L. Zimmerman. 2010. Corporate governance myths: Comments on Armstrong, Guay, and Weber. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2-3):235-245.
5. Core, J. E. 2001. A review of the empirical disclosure literature: discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1-3):441-456.
6. Dechow, P., W. Ge, and C. Schrand. 2010. Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2-3):344-401.
7. DeFond, M. L. 2010. Earnings quality research: Advances, challenges and future research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2-3):402-409.
8. Fields, T. D., T. Z. Lys, and L. Vincent. 2001. Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1-3):255-307.
9. Francis, J. 2001. Discussion of empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1-3):309-319.
10. Healy, P. M., and K. G. Palepu. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1-3):405-440.
11. Holthausen, R. W., and R. L. Watts. 2001. The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1-3):3-75.
12. Kothari, S. P. 2001. Capital markets research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1-3):105-231.
13. Kothari, S. P., K. Ramanna, and D. J. Skinner. 2010. Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2-3):246-286.
14. Lambert, R. 2010. Discussion of "Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting". Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2-3):287-295.
15. Lee, C. M. C. 2001. Market efficiency and accounting research: a discussion of [`]capital market research in accounting' by S.P. Kothari. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1-3):233-253.
16. Lewellen, J. 2010. Accounting anomalies and fundamental analysis: An alternative view. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2-3):455-466.
17. Maydew, E. L. 2001. Empirical tax research in accounting: A discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1-3):389-403.
18. Richardson, S., I. Tuna, and P. Wysocki. 2010. Accounting anomalies and fundamental analysis: A review of recent research advances. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (2-3):410-454.
19. Shackelford, D. A., and T. Shevlin. 2001. Empirical tax research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1-3):321-387.


雷达卡

京公网安备 11010802022788号







