楼主: reduce_fat
4010 20

[财经英语角区] 20120609 Follow Me 394 The U.S. Tax System Needs Rebuilding (with comments) [推广有奖]

荣誉版主

海外论坛首席管理员

已卖:18504份资源

泰斗

28%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

海外原创经济论文和写作技巧

威望
11
论坛币
3591257 个
通用积分
34054.8393
学术水平
6834 点
热心指数
7193 点
信用等级
6665 点
经验
1830 点
帖子
12424
精华
78
在线时间
1974 小时
注册时间
2011-6-13
最后登录
2025-10-23

一级伯乐勋章 初级热心勋章 初级学术勋章 中级热心勋章 中级学术勋章 高级学术勋章 初级信用勋章 特级学术勋章 高级热心勋章 中级信用勋章 特级热心勋章 高级信用勋章 特级信用勋章

楼主
reduce_fat 发表于 2012-6-8 00:51:41 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
The US tax system needs rebuilding
by Lawrence Summers

The writer of the article is Charles W. Eliot university professor at Harvard University and a former US Treasury Secretary

The article was too long to be pasted here and also needed permission to paste to any websites, so I only provided the original article's link in the thread below.

original article's link: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/38274f48-5e4f-11e1-8c87-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1x7fhAaw9

I think everyone, who finds and posts great articles in this forum, should carefully read and comment the forwarded article, and then let others to comment your thread. Consequently, all of us could learn something from the article. Do not just post a forwarded article without your own comments for adding "hot and great (精华)" and earning experience points. The reason is that you would not learn anything from the article without carefully reading and analyzing the article.


I did not analyze the whole article again, but I analyzed three main points that the author mentioned about the current U.S. tax system and its ongoing reform.


The author's first main point was to stress that "the U.S. will need to mobilise more revenue" (Eilot, 2012). Back to Bush's Administration, the federal government cut taxes for the rich. Currently, Obama's Administration cuts taxes for the low-income family and the middle class in order to help them recover from the downturn economy as soon as possible. However, cutting tax is not good in the long run not only because cutting tax will hurt Americans' future generations' benefits. Another reason is caused by the rising cost of healthcare and the cost of healthcare reform, and other government spending projects. Healthcare reform is a big topic, so I would not further discuss it here. Nevertheless, all of government projects cannot be implemented without earning enough revenue, but that does not mean the government should rely on borrowing a lot of money from other countries. The reason is that Americans' future generations have to pay back the bill the current people owes that will increase their future economic burdens.  

Cutting non-urgent projects and rasing taxes on the rich taxpayers at the same time should be a solution to reform the current "unfair" tax system. In his second main point, the author explained more details about why we should raise taxes on the rich to reduce the income gap among different classes in the U.S. You can read his opinion in the original article, so I will not further discuss it here.

Moreover, the author's third point was to demonstrate U.S. tax code and marginal tax rates. Of course the rich has to pay higher marginal tax rates than the low-income households. However, the current upper limit marginal tax rates is below 50%. I haven't searched any data, so I cannot give you a detailed analysis here. But one thing is clear that the U.S. government should set tax breaks on low-income families and raise taxes on the rich to reduce the income gap between these two classes in the ongoing tax system reform.

By the way, I have analyzed the U.S. tax reform for Obama's Administration in 2010, but I don't have time to modify and share my paper with you here today. If I have time, I will do so later this summer or this fall.

I only took an hour to read and comment the article. If you find any mistakes I made in my comments, please point them out, and I will correct them later on. Now you guys are welcome to continue the discussion below.   









二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:rebuilding Comments Building comment System

已有 11 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
cll9981 + 1 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论
麦田里的守护者 + 1 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论
admin_kefu + 100 根据规定进行奖励
whachel1976 + 5 + 5 + 4 精彩帖子
caihongchn + 2 + 2 + 2 对论坛有贡献
happylife87 + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
zhdefei + 2 + 2 + 2 精彩帖子
shenxiaoqiang + 5 + 5 + 5 谢谢
mu_lianzheng + 100 + 20 + 5 + 5 + 5 对论坛有贡献
洛城隐士 + 1

总评分: 经验 + 100  论坛币 + 120  学术水平 + 28  热心指数 + 28  信用等级 + 27   查看全部评分

复制粘贴积分链接 https://bbs.pinggu.org/ext8_airdrop.php?airdropfrom^^uid=2669999

沙发
reduce_fat 发表于 2012-6-8 00:59:11
Haha, I am the first user commented the thread below. Please read the main thread and my comment. The author did not follow the rules to post a forwarded article, so probably his thread did not draw much attention to other people.

https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1491645-1-1.html
已有 1 人评分经验 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
绵阳 + 100 + 3 + 3 + 2 上次文章太经典了

总评分: 经验 + 100  学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 2   查看全部评分

复制粘贴积分链接 https://bbs.pinggu.org/ext8_airdrop.php?airdropfrom^^uid=2669999

受到警告 藤椅
guleijoy 在职认证  发表于 2012-6-8 10:56:15
提示: 受到警告  mu_lianzheng 灌水 2012-6-8 11:58

受到警告 板凳
小/aiq冤家 发表于 2012-6-8 12:01:54
提示: 受到警告  mu_lianzheng 灌水 2012-6-8 12:46
我只想说  你的英文真好啊

报纸
xiaoyuanxiao 发表于 2012-6-8 13:59:10
Your comment is eyecatching, and your offering viewpoints in English(english) is encouraging for whomever(whoever) loves the forum.  I am sure you are enterprisng and meticulous.

By(by) the way, have you registered in FT? Can you read all the articles?


请注意:英语文章中段落之间要采用缩行式或者空行式,两者需要任意选择一种.
缩行式是指每段首字母缩进4个字符,段落之间不空行;
空行式是指每段首字母顶格写,段落之间要空一行.

如果既不缩行也不空行,整个文章浑然一体,就不太好了.


已有 2 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
麦田里的守护者 + 1 + 1 观点有启发
mu_lianzheng + 20 + 16 + 2 + 2 + 2 请注意我的修改与提示

总评分: 经验 + 20  论坛币 + 16  学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 2   查看全部评分

受到警告 地板
dafanfanda 发表于 2012-6-8 14:33:57
提示: 受到警告  mu_lianzheng 灌水 2012-6-8 17:17

7
happylife87 发表于 2012-6-8 15:32:37
Tax system is not completely perfect, and a trade-off between fair and efficiency is always the topic. I am not sure if some structural changes may have good effects.

By the way, I want to comment on China's interest rates cut down. It seems to be a bit good for economic growth, but this effect is not significant for future development and private investment. The consequence will be more severe inflation, deterioration of economic structure and the more painful life of ordinary people who are earning limited wages and saves a little for risk-preventing.
已有 1 人评分经验 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
mu_lianzheng + 100 + 2 + 2 + 2 Good

总评分: 经验 + 100  学术水平 + 2  热心指数 + 2  信用等级 + 2   查看全部评分

8
小/aiq冤家 发表于 2012-6-8 18:14:13
guleijoy 发表于 2012-6-8 10:56
哎   原来不给人家经验  币之类的就要被警告 啊 !!!!哈哈哈哈哈

9
mu_lianzheng 发表于 2012-6-8 19:01:36
小/aiq冤家 发表于 2012-6-8 18:14
哎   原来不给人家经验  币之类的就要被警告 啊 !!!!哈哈哈哈哈
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1422496-1-1.html
您好,请看这个帖子楼主的最后一行:
但是诸如支持楼主,看看等回帖,本版将会对初犯作出警告,屡犯做出屏蔽回帖等惩罚,请各位水贴者注意!!

特别提示一下,本版块除非是回答别人提问或者就细节提出意见,否则不能在回帖中涉及到与评论文章无关的内容,稍后我会发置顶帖特别强调这一点



coffee

10
yongjianlin 发表于 2012-6-8 21:45:49
I've thought the article would be on the topic of lowering the benchmark interest rate. I remembered(remebered) that our country take a tax reform to increase the base line of income to pay the tax, which seemed reducing much government gains. What I  most worried(worride) about is our country's tax supervising memchanism, as we all know, many millionaires(millionares) in our country have been trying their efforts to transfer their wealth to foreign countrys to take tax evasion. What's more how to evalute the 'gray income' and to tax it is another(annother) hot topic. Finally , thanks for sharing.
PS:现在本版块的灌水似乎比较多哟,还有人数似乎也少了些哟。偶不才,不是学经济金融管理之类,很多文章有时看的还是比较费劲,不过断断续续大部分时间坚持下来,提高了好多,也学习了好多经济的知识。希望后来者能够加油,这是个学习的好版块,要珍惜。
已有 2 人评分经验 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
麦田里的守护者 + 1 + 1 观点有启发
mu_lianzheng + 100 + 2 + 2 很认真,请注意我的修改

总评分: 经验 + 100  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 2   查看全部评分

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-29 04:48