楼主: reduce_fat
749 12

[财经英语角区] 20120627 Follow Me 412 Putting China’s Economic Power in Perspective [推广有奖]

荣誉版主

海外论坛首席管理员

已卖:18504份资源

泰斗

28%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

海外原创经济论文和写作技巧

威望
11
论坛币
3591257 个
通用积分
34054.8393
学术水平
6834 点
热心指数
7193 点
信用等级
6665 点
经验
1830 点
帖子
12424
精华
78
在线时间
1974 小时
注册时间
2011-6-13
最后登录
2025-10-23

一级伯乐勋章 初级热心勋章 初级学术勋章 中级热心勋章 中级学术勋章 高级学术勋章 初级信用勋章 特级学术勋章 高级热心勋章 中级信用勋章 特级热心勋章 高级信用勋章 特级信用勋章

楼主
reduce_fat 发表于 2012-6-26 00:40:41 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Putting China’s Economic Power in Perspective

By CATHERINE RAMPELL

The original article was taken from the New York Times at http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/15/putting-chinas-economic-power-in-perspective/?ref=china


You guys are welcome to comment the issues covered in the article under the main thread.



In January, David Leonhardt noted a finding that more Americans said China was the world’s leading superpower than said the United States was. New global survey data from Pew Research Center suggests this view is becoming more widespread around the world — although, tellingly, not in China itself.


Pew conducted annual surveys in 14 different countries by telephone or through face-to-face interviews from 2008 to 2012, and asked about which country was considered to be the leading superpower. Economic awe for China surpassed that for the United States in the last year:



Not all people in all countries feel this way, of course.

Here’s a breakdown, by country, of responses to the question when it was asked this spring. The left column shows which country was answering the question, and the rows show what percentage of respondents in that country said the United States, China, Japan or the European Union is the world’s leading economic power.



Since that post in January, Americans have actually become about as likely to name their own country as the world’s leading economic power as they are to name China (40 percent naming the United States, 41 percent China).

But as you can see, it’s primarily the developed world that views China as the greater juggernaut. Britain, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Greece and the Czech Republic are among the countries whose populations are more likely to say China’s economic power has eclipsed America’s.

Now look at the developing world. In most of these countries — Turkey, Tunisia, Pakistan, India, Brazil and Mexico — respondents were significantly more likely to rate the United States as more economically powerful than China.

Even in China — where you might expect patriotism to buoy citizens’ assessments of their economy — respondents were far more likely to say the United States rather than China is the world’s leading economic power (48 percent said the United States was most powerful, and 29 percent named China).

Why might the Chinese feel this way, when their growth rate was four times ours last quarter?

Because that spectacular Chinese growth is coming from a very low base, as William Easterly, a development economist at New York University, reminds us in a related post. Additionally, the country’s overall wealth is divided among a gigantic population.
Put those factors together and you get a country where incomes are growing quickly, but most people are still very poor. The typical person is going from really poor to somewhat less poor. The gross domestic product per capita in China was $8,400 in 2011; in the United States, it was nearly six times that, at $48,100.

People in China (and the rest of the developing world) know that their living standards are lower than Americans’, and that American consumers and American economic leadership still have vast sway over what happens in the poorer corners of the world. On the other hand, people in the developed world read about sky-high economic growth and the country’s displacement of workers in rich countries, and believe China is already the biggest economic power.

Of course, economic “power” could be judged by other things besides wealth — such as the ability to keep the world economy from blowing up. In that case, the one-sixth of Germans who named the European Union as the world’s biggest economic power are probably correct.


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:perspective Perspectiv Economic Putting follow China Power

回帖推荐

happylife87 发表于3楼  查看完整内容

I always like to see such statistics or rankings. Each indicator has its advantages and disadvantages, and the use needs more care. I think more indicators can be taken into consideration, and people sometimes overestimate the success of China without thinking about the losses and costs.
已有 4 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
桶桶nancy + 5 + 5 + 5 对论坛有贡献
caihongchn + 3 + 3 + 3 精彩帖子
mu_lianzheng + 40 + 40 + 2 + 2 + 2 精彩帖子
happylife87 + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子

总评分: 经验 + 40  论坛币 + 40  学术水平 + 11  热心指数 + 11  信用等级 + 11   查看全部评分

复制粘贴积分链接 https://bbs.pinggu.org/ext8_airdrop.php?airdropfrom^^uid=2669999

沙发
reduce_fat 发表于 2012-6-26 00:43:32
No matter you agree or disagree the author's viewpoints, please comment the controversial topic.
复制粘贴积分链接 https://bbs.pinggu.org/ext8_airdrop.php?airdropfrom^^uid=2669999

藤椅
happylife87 发表于 2012-6-26 13:59:04
I always like to see such statistics or rankings. Each indicator has its advantages and disadvantages, and the use needs more care. I think more indicators can be taken into consideration, and people sometimes overestimate the success of China without thinking about the losses and costs.
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
mu_lianzheng + 20 + 20 + 1 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 经验 + 20  论坛币 + 20  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

板凳
luotuo365 发表于 2012-6-27 08:37:22
different position,different views。it depends on。。。
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 收起 理由
mu_lianzheng + 10 + 10 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 经验 + 10  论坛币 + 10   查看全部评分

报纸
danellv 发表于 2012-6-27 09:22:43
Our superpower is on a hollow base. These statistics are the politic achievements or so called "政绩" because our officials need them to get promotion. But the citizens cannot even buy a house. We do not care about who is the superpower, who has a 2-digital economic grouth rate, or we do not even have to be treated pretty fair, but need cheaper food, cheaper housing, and cheaper gas. Screw the super power, it is not belong to us, the citizens.
已有 2 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
mu_lianzheng + 30 + 10 + 1 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论
eros_zz + 20 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 经验 + 30  论坛币 + 30  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 2  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

地板
jias2009 发表于 2012-6-27 12:01:52
在国外期刊上能开到这类文章,说明中国确实在进步,而且进步明显,可以说是大踏步前进。
幸福的标准:数钱数到手发麻,睡觉睡到自然醒。

7
xiaoyuanxiao 发表于 2012-6-27 13:31:59
Ordinary foreigners especially those of developed countries do not know a lot about china, what they know is just from media, but  media,even some foreign experts  always exaggerate china's economic power, pay less attention to china's big population , gross domestic product per capita and undeveloped areas in china(of course ,when someone wants to criticize china in respect of human rights, they may mention the undeveloped or remoted area).  
      We chinese should have rational  evaluation on our economic power, we can not be 忽悠!
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
mu_lianzheng + 40 + 60 + 1 + 1 + 1 分析的有道理

总评分: 经验 + 40  论坛币 + 60  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

8
commonbin 发表于 2012-6-27 15:41:53
danellv 发表于 2012-6-27 09:22
Our superpower is on a hollow base. These statistics are the politic achievements or so called "政绩 ...
I like this comment from the normal level prospect, I would like to see that our government evaluation indicator can take a consideration of it, or I could understand the construction of the housing, the highway, subway, landscape, etc which can improve our real life standard later on.
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
mu_lianzheng + 60 + 60 + 2 + 2 + 2 分析的有道理

总评分: 经验 + 60  论坛币 + 60  学术水平 + 2  热心指数 + 2  信用等级 + 2   查看全部评分

9
danellv 发表于 2012-6-27 16:07:12
commonbin 发表于 2012-6-27 15:41
I like this comment from the normal level prospect, I would like to see that our government evalua ...
We can see in big cities, roads and buildings are being re-constructed, although they may just exist there for 10 years. Some roads are even worse because of no arrangement of electricity wires, gas pipes, etc. All these contribute to the big number of GDP. When we seeing deeper, may be more than 50% of GDP is wasting money, other 40% is real promotion with only 10% close to our life standard.

10
commonbin 发表于 2012-6-27 17:46:38
danellv 发表于 2012-6-27 16:07
We can see in big cities, roads and buildings are being re-constructed, although they may just exi ...
Danellv, you are more partly right in my view. However we can't only collect these called GDP project as waste money, political promotion purpose but a way to creat job, to distribute wealthy. what's the money role without others dept? nothing, right? we can't only distribute cash to our citizen,. the socity is a system.
I would'd like to see our enconomic space do not pay a high cost of our happiness, our living standard and gov would better to set a effective, clear serial rules to implement socity civilzation.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-26 00:56