楼主: joeyoding
1327 1

Belief Elicitation in Experiments Is there a Hedging Problem [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

已卖:31份资源

高中生

25%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
68 个
通用积分
0.0600
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
243 点
帖子
23
精华
0
在线时间
14 小时
注册时间
2005-6-27
最后登录
2015-6-17

楼主
joeyoding 发表于 2012-7-13 02:59:54 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Belief Elicitation in Experiments  Is there a Hedging Problem
Belief Elicitation in Experiments Is there a Hedging Problem.pdf (576.09 KB, 需要: 2 个论坛币)


摘要:
Belief-elicitation experiments usually reward accuracy of stated beliefs in addition to payments
for other decisions. But this allows risk-averse subjects to hedge with their stated beliefs against
adverse outcomes of the other decisions. So can we trust the existing belief-elicitation results?
And can we avoid potential hedging confounds? We propose an experimental design that theoretically eliminates hedging opportunities. Using this design we test for the empirical relevance
of hedging effects in the lab. Our results suggest that hedging confounds are not a major problem
if hedging opportunities are not very prominent. But if hedging opportunities are transparent,
and incentives to hedge are strong, many subjects do spot hedging opportunities and respond to
them. The bias can go beyond players actually hedging themselves, because some expect others
to hedge best respond to this.


———— 不是信念偏好,具体怎么翻译我找不到特别准确的词语,简单说来就是问你对在某件事情发生之前,该事情发生的概率。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Experiments experiment hedging problem Belief potential subjects addition existing usually

沙发
jsg999000(未真实交易用户) 发表于 2012-7-18 22:10:19
能简单介绍下论文内容吗?是关于信念偏好的吗?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-4 11:07