楼主: 制度反腐943
177 0

[英文文献] Voting on Infrastructure Investment: The Role of Product Market Competition... [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-19
最后登录
2020-9-19

楼主
制度反腐943 发表于 2005-4-11 08:58:01 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Voting on Infrastructure Investment: The Role of Product Market Competition-基础设施投资的投票:产品市场竞争的作用
英文文献作者:Arghya Ghosh,Kieron Meagher
英文文献摘要:
In spatial competition, public infrastructure plays a crucial role in determining product market outcomes. In our model, consideration of infrastructure’s impact on the product market drives the voting behavior of consumers in their dual role as voter/taxpayers. The spatial heterogeneity of consumers produces conflicting political interests and in many cases inefficient outcomes. However across both exogenous and endogenous market environments product market competition consistently leads to higher levels of publicly funded infrastructure than monopoly/collusion. Furthermore, competition’s boost to the popular support for infrastructure investment is often excessive while monopoly leads to underinvestment.

在空间竞争中,公共基础设施对产品市场结果起着决定性作用。在我们的模型中,对基础设施对产品市场影响的考虑驱动了双重角色的消费者的投票行为,即选民/纳税人。消费者的空间异质性产生了相互冲突的政治利益,在许多情况下产生了无效的结果。然而,在外生和内生市场环境中,产品市场竞争始终比垄断/勾结导致更高水平的公共资金基础设施。此外,竞争对公众支持基础设施投资的推动往往是过度的,而垄断导致投资不足。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-29 15:44