楼主: chifuhuang
2581 3

[经济热点解读] 为什么商界精英身价过亿,而政治精英不行? [推广有奖]

已卖:313份资源

本科生

33%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

波动的读书笔记

威望
0
论坛币
9 个
通用积分
9.1270
学术水平
2 点
热心指数
2 点
信用等级
2 点
经验
560 点
帖子
53
精华
0
在线时间
122 小时
注册时间
2012-7-13
最后登录
2025-12-26

楼主
chifuhuang 发表于 2012-10-28 20:51:16 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币


今天看BBC练英语,没想到看到了这个,感叹如果一个商人身价是27亿绝不会有人议论,为什么政治精英就会如此,感觉不公平。

China'sxxx family rejects New York Times claims
Lawyers for Chinese Premier xxx's family haverejected New York Times claims that they have amassed "hidden riches"of billions of dollars.

In a statement carried by Hong Kong media, theysaid that while some of the family were involved in business activities none ofit was illegal.

The US newspaper reported on Friday that Mr xxx'sfamily controlled assets worth at least $2.7bn (£1.7bn).

It responded to the statement on Sunday, saying itstood by the story.

China has condemned the report as a smear, and NYTsites are blocked in the country, as are references to the report onmicro-blogging sites.

Legal threat

Bai Tao of the Junhe Law Office and Wang Weidongof the Grandall Law Firm released the statement late on Saturday eveningresponding to the "untrue" New York Times report.

"The so-called 'hidden riches' ofxxx's familymembers in The New York Times' report does not exist," the statement said.

The lawyers also denied that Mr xxx had any rolein his family's business activities, nor allowed them to influence policy.

It specifically referred to Mr xxx's 90-year-oldmother, who it said had no property nor any income apart from her salary andpension.

One of the central claims of the report was thatYang Zhiyun had a $120m investment in Ping An Insurance.

The statement ended with an apparent threat oflegal action.

"We will continue to make clarificationsregarding other untrue reports by the New York Times, and reserve the right tohold it legally responsible," it said.

But Times spokeswoman Eileen Murphy expressedconfidence in the report.

"We are standing by our story, which we areincredibly proud of and which is an example of the quality investigativejournalism The Times is known for," she wrote in an email quoted by thenewspaper.

Power transition

In its report, the New York Times said Mr xxx'srelatives' holdings included property, insurance and construction firms.

"In many cases, the names of the relativeshave been hidden behind layers of partnerships and investment vehiclesinvolving friends, work colleagues and business partners," it said.

The newspaper said both the Chinese government andMr xxx's relatives declined to comment on the investigation, which was based oncorporate records from 1992-2012.

China is sensitive about reports on its leaders,particularly when it comes to their wealth.

A growing wealth gap is causing public discontent,as are the frequent corruption scandals involving government officials.

When, in June 2012, a Bloomberg investigativereport examined the finances of the relatives of president-in-waitingxxx, thecompany's website was blocked in China - even though the report said there wasno indication of wrongdoing by him or his family.

Mrxxx has been the Chinese premier for almost 10years. He is due to step down in a power transition that begins on 8 November.

He is seen as a popular figure with the commontouch, and is portrayed in state media as a leader with great concern for thelives of ordinary people.

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Partnerships Construction Partnership Responsible Investment activities newspaper business involved reported

回帖推荐

1253197054 发表于6楼  查看完整内容

如果将世界看做由经济、政治、学术构成的三面体,那么经济的衡量标准是金钱、政治的衡量标准是权利或者关系、学术的衡量标准是知识,所以这是由自身领域本质所决定的……试想,如果搞政治的、学术的都是为了钱,搞经济的都是为了政治、学术,是否会出现混乱局面呢?……有木有道理哇

沙发
杜小杰 发表于 2012-10-29 18:37:40
因为你在用金钱在衡量人生

藤椅
xhymnx 发表于 2012-10-29 18:49:36
说中国的事?
太简单了,都在喝XXXXXXX的血,只不过有些人有吃相的要求,而有些没有罢了。

板凳
1253197054 发表于 2012-10-29 19:04:45
如果将世界看做由经济、政治、学术构成的三面体,那么经济的衡量标准是金钱、政治的衡量标准是权利或者关系、学术的衡量标准是知识,所以这是由自身领域本质所决定的……试想,如果搞政治的、学术的都是为了钱,搞经济的都是为了政治、学术,是否会出现混乱局面呢?……有木有道理哇
hello,hawaii

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-2 00:41