楼主: 贸易赤字430
330 0

[英文文献] Measuring Effects of Trade Policy Distortions: How far have we come?-衡量贸易政策... [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-19
最后登录
2020-9-19

楼主
贸易赤字430 发表于 2005-5-9 13:18:28 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Measuring Effects of Trade Policy Distortions: How far have we come?-衡量贸易政策扭曲的影响:我们已经走了多远?
英文文献作者:Kym Anderson
英文文献摘要:
After a brief review of the literature to the early 1970s, this paper assesses the contributions during the past three decades to measuring the distortionary effects of trade policies. It does not pretend to be comprehensive, but draws on selections from the literature that give a sense of the distance the profession has travelled from a trade policy practitioner?’s viewpoint since Corden?’s first paper on the subject in 1957. Phenomenal though that progress has been, there is ample room for further improvement in computing the economic (and other) effects of trade-related policies and their reform. The paper concludes with suggestions of where the priorities should be in global modelling of trade policy reform, as the world moves into the next round of multilateral trade negotiations.

在简要回顾了上世纪70年代初的文献之后,本文评估了过去30年对衡量贸易政策扭曲效应的贡献。它并不假装是全面的,但从文献的选择,提供了一种感觉,从贸易政策实践时代的观点,该职业已走过的距离,自CordenA的第一份论文在1957年的主题。尽管取得了显著的进展,但在计算与贸易有关的政策及其改革的经济(和其他)影响方面还有进一步改进的余地。该文件最后提出了在世界进入下一轮多边贸易谈判时,贸易政策改革的全球模型应优先考虑的问题。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-18 07:26