关于Pareto效率的一个问题(5金币)

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

<div style="LINE-HEIGHT: 22px; HEIGHT: 22px;"></div><div style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-TOP: 10px; FONT-SIZE: 11pt; OVERFLOW-X: hidden; WIDTH: 97%; WORD-BREAK: break-all; TEXT-INDENT: 24px; LINE-HEIGHT: normal; HEIGHT: 200px; WORD-WRAP: break-word;"><p>书上是这样写的：</p><p>The advantage of Pareto's definitions is that they do not require us to make interpersonal coparisons of people's utilities. Since there are winners but no losers if resources can be allocated to achieve a Pareto improvement, we can argue that social welfare must be higher. In practice, however, most reallocations create winners and losers. <strong>We can still avoid the need to make interpersonal comparisons of utility by assuming lump-sum redistribution.</strong> That is, income can be resheffled without any loss in economic efficiency. The assumption that lump-sum redistribution can be used to ensure that no one loses from a Pareto improving reallocation is called the copensation principle.</p><p></p><p>粗体的是什么意思，存在不影响效率的再分配吗？他要表达的涵义是什么？不是要做翻译！！！</p></div>

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-12-27 4:30:06编辑过]

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏0 回帖

关键词：pareto ARE RET distribution Reallocation 效率 金币 pareto

<p>我们仍然可以，在总收入不变而只有收入重新分配的假设下，避免进行个人效用的主观比较。</p>

<p>哪本书的？</p><p></p>

我们应该避免在总收入不变的情况下，通过重新分配的方式来增加效用.