楼主: 暗示效应184
297 0

[英文文献] Sorting out Guidelines for the Good Evaluation of Research Practices [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-21
最后登录
2020-9-21

楼主
暗示效应184 发表于 2005-6-15 00:34:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Sorting out Guidelines for the Good Evaluation of Research Practices
英文文献作者:Cinzia Daraio,Alessio Vaccari
英文文献摘要:
In this paper, we propose the adoption of moral philosophy and in particular normative ethics, to clarify the concept of ???good?? evaluation of ???research practices?? . Our perspective is based on the idea that research is a form of social practice according to MacIntyre (1985)???s conceptualization. From MacIntyre???s notion, we elaborate three typologies of researcher: the leader, the good researcher and the honest researcher. Reflecting on what is a ???good?? research practice and on what is the role of researchers in it provides insight into some aspects of both the selfassessment process and how this promotes individual improvement. Moreover, this kind of reflection helps us to describe the functions (missions) of the research practices. A ???good?? evaluation should take into account all the building constituents of a ???good?? research practice and should be able to discriminate between good and bad research practices, while enforcing the functions of good research practices. These reflections may be the starting point for a paradigm shift in the evaluation of research practices which replaces an evaluation centred on products with an evaluation focused on the functions of these practices.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-29 08:04