1429 3

[经济学增长周期理论] 文献研读1(19):Measuring the spillover effects: Some Chinese evidence [推广有奖]

学科带头人

83%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
11846 个
通用积分
123.9686
学术水平
56 点
热心指数
84 点
信用等级
52 点
经验
28826 点
帖子
1588
精华
2
在线时间
2095 小时
注册时间
2007-4-28
最后登录
2024-11-19

楼主
区域经济爱好者 发表于 2014-3-7 13:20:08 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
第一个主题:经济增长
第19篇文章:Ying, L. G. (2000). Measuring the spillover effects: SomeChinese evidence.Papers in Regional Science, 79(1), 75–89.


从文章学到什么?

一是,怎么使用Moran指数确定辐射的范围。

二是,怎么使用Moran指数测度是否存在辐射效应。

三是,文章对既有研究的梳理很清晰。



辐射距离的确定

I start by searching for an appropriate value for thedistance d. This value should represent the distance at which spatialassociation is maximized and beyond which there is an overall cessation ofspatial effects. Because the spatial association maximizes at d = 800kilometers according to a diagnostics of spatial autocorrelation using globalMoran I.



如何定义增长极

In defining the “growth pole”, Perroux (1950) argued thatone should not distinguish a propulsive industry simply by its relative rate ofgrowth. In a similar way, Higgins (1983) also suggested that if the “propulsiveregion” was too small and too unsophisticated in its economic activities, itwould not generate significant spread effects of any kind.



关于MoranI 的显著性

The normal assumption may not be appropriate according toAnselin (1995). For this specific case, an asymptotic Wald test for normalityis computed for the local Morans. The result turns out to be highlysignificant, revealing a non-normal, highly skewed distribution of the observedIi. In order for the test to be used in the specific and more realisticbackground, an empirical random permutation approach is conducted.



评议:

空间计量具有不可识别性。


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Spillover Measuring evidence Chinese effects represent searching evidence distance beyond

感兴趣领域——宏观经济、区域经济与技术经济

沙发
bigfisher 发表于 2014-3-7 13:46:49
继续啊,楼主

藤椅
区域经济爱好者 发表于 2014-3-7 14:23:22
bigfisher 发表于 2014-3-7 13:46
继续啊,楼主
Thank you bigfisher.
I am busy this month, so I did not talk about your paper. Sorry.
I'm sure I will talk with you from April 1st.
感兴趣领域——宏观经济、区域经济与技术经济

板凳
区域经济爱好者 发表于 2014-3-7 14:25:25
上面提到的空间计量的缺陷--不可识别问题,让我有点讨厌空间计量了。
或许从投入产出的角度研究溢出,才是正途。。。。
欢迎讨论。
感兴趣领域——宏观经济、区域经济与技术经济

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-31 11:30