发帖
雷达卡
Results from DEAP Version 2.1
Instruction file = $$TEMP$$.INS
Data file = $$TEMP$$.DTA
Input orientated DEA
Scale assumption: CRS
Slacks calculated using multi-stage method
EFFICIENCY SUMMARY:
firm te
1 0.801
2 0.872
3 0.805
4 0.737
5 0.698
6 1.000
7 0.709
8 1.000
9 1.000
10 0.897
11 0.866
12 0.689
13 0.855
14 0.574
15 0.787
16 0.802
17 0.602
18 0.639
19 1.000
20 0.590
21 0.629
22 0.547
23 0.437
24 0.668
25 0.545
26 0.525
27 0.414
28 0.444
29 0.616
mean 0.715
SUMMARY OF OUTPUT SLACKS:
firm output: 1
1 0.000
2 0.000
3 0.000
4 0.000
5 0.000
6 0.000
7 0.000
8 0.000
9 0.000
10 0.000
11 0.000
12 0.000
13 0.000
14 0.000
15 0.000
16 0.000
17 0.000
18 0.000
19 0.000
20 0.000
21 0.000
22 0.000
23 0.000
24 0.000
25 0.000
26 0.000
27 0.000
28 0.000
29 0.000
mean 0.000
SUMMARY OF INPUT SLACKS:
firm input: 1 2
1 0.000 1158.855
2 0.000 0.000
3 0.000 0.000
4 26.826 0.000
5 0.000 0.000
6 0.000 0.000
7 0.000 0.000
8 0.000 0.000
9 0.000 0.000
10 0.000 0.000
11 0.000 0.000
12 0.000 0.000
13 0.000 0.000
14 0.000 0.000
15 0.000 0.000
16 0.000 0.000
17 0.000 0.000
18 0.000 0.000
19 0.000 0.000
20 0.000 0.000
21 0.000 0.000
22 0.000 0.000
23 0.000 0.000
24 0.000 0.000
25 0.000 0.000
26 0.000 0.000
27 0.000 0.000
28 0.000 0.000
29 0.000 22.611
mean 0.925 40.740
SUMMARY OF PEERS:
firm peers:
1 9
2 9 19
3 8 6
4 8
5 8 6
6 6
7 6 19
8 8
9 9
10 9 19
11 19 9
12 6 19
13 6 19
14 6 19
15 6 19
16 8 6
17 9 19
18 6 19
19 19
20 6 19
21 6 19
22 6 19
23 6 19
24 9 19
25 6 19
26 6 19
27 19 9
28 19 9
29 9
SUMMARY OF PEER WEIGHTS:
(in same order as above)
firm peer weights:
1 0.415
2 0.170 0.125
3 0.015 0.833
4 0.590
5 0.215 0.072
6 1.000
7 0.143 0.088
8 1.000
9 1.000
10 0.285 0.695
11 0.515 0.093
12 0.369 0.012
13 0.224 0.138
14 0.209 0.006
15 0.329 0.563
16 1.150 0.251
17 0.027 0.218
18 0.322 0.026
19 1.000
20 0.116 0.039
21 0.114 0.040
22 0.160 0.113
23 0.003 0.049
24 0.004 0.080
25 0.102 0.063
26 0.078 0.043
27 0.000 0.027
28 0.011 0.016
29 0.125
PEER COUNT SUMMARY:
(i.e., no. times each firm is a peer for another)
firm peer count:
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 15
7 0
8 4
9 9
10 0
11 0
12 0
13 0
14 0
15 0
16 0
17 0
18 0
19 19
20 0
21 0
22 0
23 0
24 0
25 0
26 0
27 0
28 0
29 0
SUMMARY OF OUTPUT TARGETS:
firm output: 1
1 2908.820
2 2940.400
3 3766.850
4 1396.730
5 830.320
6 4480.320
7 1876.650
8 2365.440
9 7003.900
10 11747.830
11 7882.470
12 1821.610
13 2945.000
14 1016.020
15 9377.370
16 3843.180
17 3239.510
18 1811.220
19 14035.350
20 1059.200
21 1072.830
22 2304.510
23 696.600
24 1157.400
25 1338.200
26 951.210
27 194.100
28 268.810
29 876.570
SUMMARY OF INPUT TARGETS:
firm input: 1 2
1 86.568 2819.208
2 107.602 2374.955
3 219.777 2483.766
4 104.726 918.405
5 56.867 546.563
6 260.680 2954.290
7 88.294 1284.724
8 177.360 1555.370
9 208.440 6788.130
10 461.618 8739.227
11 317.619 5677.422
12 103.103 1207.682
13 138.497 2016.237
14 57.732 673.085
15 411.772 6486.149
16 269.303 2529.123
17 131.485 2310.820
18 99.123 1208.468
19 578.940 9792.530
20 52.456 719.177
21 52.920 728.911
22 107.212 1580.372
23 28.970 485.487
24 47.420 815.127
25 62.955 916.122
26 45.124 650.342
27 5.837 186.685
28 9.772 218.662
29 26.087 849.565
FIRM BY FIRM RESULTS:
Results for firm: 1
Technical efficiency = 0.801
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 2908.820 0.000 0.000 2908.820
input 1 108.020 -21.452 0.000 86.568
input 2 4963.840 -985.778 -1158.855 2819.208
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
9 0.415
Results for firm: 2
Technical efficiency = 0.872
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 2940.400 0.000 0.000 2940.400
input 1 123.440 -15.838 0.000 107.602
input 2 2724.530 -349.575 0.000 2374.955
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
9 0.170
19 0.125
Results for firm: 3
Technical efficiency = 0.805
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 3766.850 0.000 0.000 3766.850
input 1 272.980 -53.203 0.000 219.777
input 2 3085.030 -601.264 0.000 2483.766
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
8 0.015
6 0.833
Results for firm: 4
Technical efficiency = 0.737
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 1396.730 0.000 0.000 1396.730
input 1 178.570 -47.018 -26.826 104.726
input 2 1246.650 -328.245 0.000 918.405
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
8 0.590
Results for firm: 5
Technical efficiency = 0.698
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 830.320 0.000 0.000 830.320
input 1 81.440 -24.573 0.000 56.867
input 2 782.740 -236.177 0.000 546.563
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
8 0.215
6 0.072
Results for firm: 6
Technical efficiency = 1.000
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 4480.320 0.000 0.000 4480.320
input 1 260.680 0.000 0.000 260.680
input 2 2954.290 0.000 0.000 2954.290
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
6 1.000
Results for firm: 7
Technical efficiency = 0.709
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 1876.650 0.000 0.000 1876.650
input 1 124.520 -36.226 0.000 88.294
input 2 1811.840 -527.116 0.000 1284.724
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
6 0.143
19 0.088
Results for firm: 8
Technical efficiency = 1.000
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 2365.440 0.000 0.000 2365.440
input 1 177.360 0.000 0.000 177.360
input 2 1555.370 0.000 0.000 1555.370
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
8 1.000
Results for firm: 9
Technical efficiency = 1.000
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 7003.900 0.000 0.000 7003.900
input 1 208.440 0.000 0.000 208.440
input 2 6788.130 0.000 0.000 6788.130
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
9 1.000
Results for firm: 10
Technical efficiency = 0.897
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 11747.830 0.000 0.000 11747.830
input 1 514.800 -53.182 0.000 461.618
input 2 9746.060 -1006.833 0.000 8739.227
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
9 0.285
19 0.695
Results for firm: 11
Technical efficiency = 0.866
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 7882.470 0.000 0.000 7882.470
input 1 366.620 -49.001 0.000 317.619
input 2 6553.320 -875.898 0.000 5677.422
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
19 0.515
9 0.093
Results for firm: 12
Technical efficiency = 0.689
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 1821.610 0.000 0.000 1821.610
input 1 149.730 -46.627 0.000 103.103
input 2 1753.840 -546.158 0.000 1207.682
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
6 0.369
19 0.012
Results for firm: 13
Technical efficiency = 0.855
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 2945.000 0.000 0.000 2945.000
input 1 161.930 -23.433 0.000 138.497
input 2 2357.380 -341.143 0.000 2016.237
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
6 0.224
19 0.138
Results for firm: 14
Technical efficiency = 0.574
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 1016.020 0.000 0.000 1016.020
input 1 100.650 -42.918 0.000 57.732
input 2 1173.450 -500.365 0.000 673.085
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
6 0.209
19 0.006
Results for firm: 15
Technical efficiency = 0.787
PROJECTION SUMMARY:
variable original radial slack projected
value movement movement value
output 1 9377.370 0.000 0.000 9377.370
input 1 523.080 -111.308 0.000 411.772
input 2 8239.440 -1753.291 0.000 6486.149
LISTING OF PEERS:
peer lambda weight
6 0.329
19 0.563
我用的是面板数据，输出结果里面怎么没有各个时期的效率值，跪求各位大神 予以解答？不甚感激，临表涕零！
京公网安备 11010802022788号
